05-20-2006 05:53 PM
05-22-2006 09:53 AM
Well, I guess it would depend on what you mean by "verify" but a simple way of looking at the data & seeing if the dc offset is visible is to use the CVI PlotWaveform() call in conjunction w/ a graph control. Have you tried that already?
Regards,
Andy
05-25-2006 08:18 AM
Thanks for the reply Andy,
Yes I was able to display the waveform using niScope call in functions.( I am using NI 5112 scope card 8-bit digitizer 100MHZ 100MS/s). I also have a SCB-68 pin shielded connector Block with a AT-MIO-16E board. I was able to capture a triggered pulse of the waveform using AIAcquireTriggeredWaveforms() function. I was also able to save the samples into a *.txt file. I can clearly see the 1V dc value in the record. This is the part I need some advice. Would it be valid if I write a simple program to isolate the samples with 1Vdc and take an average(mean) value to justify the 1Vdc voltage of the waveform?
Thank you in advance
CB
05-25-2006 11:35 AM
Sounds reasonable to me, slash, but maybe some of the more experienced test engineers who frequent this site have other suggestions. One thing I was wondering about was why you don’t subtract out the 1v offset from your result & plot the fundamental signal to see if it matches the characteristics of a TTL compatible signal in terms of high & low signal levels, rise & fall times, minimum pulse width, etc. If so, then wouldn’t that be the validation you are seeking? Then again, maybe I am misunderstanding your problem.....
Regards,
Andy