03-26-2010 04:24 AM
It looks like the problem happens after you rename your computer. Could you try to use the ip address instead of the computer name "EBWP4" in the symbolic link in the client process?
03-27-2010 12:55 AM
03-29-2010 11:08 AM
03-30-2010 11:53 PM
Update:
I formated the hard drive today and reinstalled the O.S. from the scratch on EBWP4 (which I did few times before too and still had problem with LookOut back then). After getting all Windows updates done, I installed LookOut (N.I. must be tired of me keep reactivating LookOut licenses). Launched client process on the server while having the server process running on EBWP5 and it worked just fine. However, I still saw other client computers connected to EBWP4 thru the Client Connection Monitor. I was expecting that none of our clients would show up in there since I didn't have the server process running on this server. I haven't try the switch over yet because it was very late. I will try it out tomorrow morning to see if it works (cross my fingers).
03-31-2010 05:01 AM
I know why you still see the client connection on EBWP4 when they actually are connecting EBWP5. I didn't realize the client should have this connection all the time. Actually you have the monitor object in client process. The monitor object keeps reading data from the primary server EBWP4, no matter if the data is online or not. So even if you don't run the server process on EBWP4, the clients are still connecting to it to monitor the status. So the "problem" connection in connection monitor is not an issue.
After you run the server process on EBWP4, please try to run the client process on EBWP5 and see if it works.
03-31-2010 09:18 AM
03-31-2010 08:45 PM
Could you give me your both server and client processes? You can upload to ftp://ftp.ni.com/incoming
I want to make sure that the problem is not in the process. And I will also try to setup the redundancy system here.
03-31-2010 09:52 PM
04-07-2010 01:30 PM
04-09-2010 05:01 AM
I tested your program on my computers and did see something wrong. It looks like I have reproduced your problem here. We are still working on it.
The problem is probably in lookout and the specific lookout process. I don't think it's related to the hardware or the OS environment.