Lookout

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

response time not working

Hello fellows, can anyone please explain me why i`m receiving data through a COM port although the time of answer is greater than the response time configured on the modbus?

21:41:13.7 - Mbus_PIPD1 ->            //Response time is set to 10 sec.
[03][03][1B][59][00][10][93][13]
21:41:40.5 - Mbus_PIPD1 <-            //Received  data arrives 27 seconds later!!!!
[03][03][40][3F][19][8C][6A][46][10][23][6A][3F][B5][D1][1C][3F][80][FD][97][42][BB][B2][25][40][3B][84][A1][3E][F9][6D][13][3E][0A][56][C3][3D][C2][81][AE][3C][E4][D4][CC][3D][12][DE][39][3C][10][C9][AB][3B][85][23][60][00][00][00][00][00][00][00][00][3F][81][71][1D][EC][23]
21:41:40.5 - Mbus_PIPD2 ->
[03][03][1B][69][00][10][93][1C]
21:41:46.6 - Mbus_PIPD2 <-
[03][03][40][00][00][00][00][FA][E1][FA][E1][41][A2][64][5B][3F][B2][89][8B][46][81][FA][51][41][A8][3D][8C][3C][91][BE][23][00][00][00][00][00][00][00][00][42][8E][9F][B0][3F][1C][80][C1][3F][B7][52][DB][3A][A3][A4][12][3B][AA][75][93][00][00][00][00][00][00][00][00][33][DB]
21:41:46.6 - Mbus_PIPD3 ->
[03][03][1B][79][00][09][53][13]
21:42:57.1 - MbB9 ->
[22][03][04][40][00][02][C3][BC]
21:43:03.3 - MbB9 <-
[22][03][04][07][9E][06][8F][CA][6F]

Thanks for any help,

Luciano.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(6,284 Views)

I believe the response time only refers to how long the object will wait for a given response to be completed without resetting for a separate response.  Since your response did not bridge the setting time, Lookout sees it as a separate valid communication.

 

Are you recieving reponse timeout alarms when this delay occurs?

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(6,253 Views)
I see, but I don´t understand why the second poll (Mbus_PIPD2) waits for the first answer to arrive... I believe that poll should be sent as soon as the response time is completed (if the poll was on the buffer). In the example I put above, once the answer from the first poll arrives, the poll from the second modbus leaves, although it was on the buffer waiting to be sent earlier.
I hope you understand what I´m trying to say, but my english is not as good as I´d like it to be...
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(6,247 Views)