11-25-2005 09:04 AM
11-25-2005 09:16 AM
11-28-2005 07:01 AM
11-28-2005 07:16 AM
11-28-2005 10:07 AM
11-28-2005
10:41 AM
- last edited on
04-21-2025
10:17 AM
by
Content Cleaner
Hi Saroj-
Glad to hear you can continue working with NI-DAQmx. There are certainly issues with working with the old 6.8 version of Traditional (Legacy) NI-DAQ; it runs more slowly, is not multi-thread safe, and it does not support any of the newer boards that you are likely to be working with. If you are switching development platforms then this is a great opportunity to switch your driver API as well so that the application will be more portable and easily-maintained in the future.
Please let me know if you have any more questions. To address one of your other questions, you can develop for NI-DAQmx using NI-DAQmx Simulated Devices. These can be very helpful for developing without the hardware actually being present.
Hopefully this helps-
11-28-2005 12:56 PM
11-28-2005
01:09 PM
- last edited on
04-21-2025
10:17 AM
by
Content Cleaner
Hi Saroj-
Yes, each version of NI-DAQmx is completely backwards-compatible with all prior versions. Obviously, NI-DAQmx is not backwards-compatible with Traditional (Legacy) NI-DAQ; that's what I meant by my comment.
There are few significant differences for text-based development between NI-DAQmx 7.5 and 8.0, but it's always a good idea to keep your driver version up-to-date because newer versions often address bugfixes for previous versions. In case you would like to update, NI-DAQmx is a free download from ni.com
Thanks and good luck with your app-
12-01-2005 07:55 AM
12-02-2005 10:59 AM
Hi saroj-
I just simulated the same device and ran the example without a problem. I would suggest that you verify you are using the correct device number. Simulated devices appear with a yellow glyph (rather than green) in MAX next to the device name. Is it possible you are entering a physical device instead of the simulated one? What happens when you try to run the test panels for the simulated device in MAX?
Thanks-