Multifunction DAQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NI 9203 accuracy problem

paperduck,

how does your setup looks like? 4-20mA current output from the balance? How is it wired? Shielded?

HOW DOES THE NOISE LOOK LIKE? ... (sorry, I shouldn't shout, but to help and suggest a filter some more data is really helpful 😉 )

Capture at least 300ms,  post a pic ( and nice: a power spectrum of the signal)

 

And also very important: How dynamic is your signal? How fast are the changes you expect? (How fast is your balance??)

 

General rule: As longer you are averaging, as lower is the noise....

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 11 of 21
(2,014 Views)

It turned out that the balance supplier didn't wire the ribbon cable correctly. It is still interesting why my old fashion multimeter gave a steady reading. Luckly we found a direct wire port from the internal board. Eventrually, I choose labjack for the convenience of my setup. Since I don't need to acquire data so often, I took the average which largely reduce the noise as you said, although the accuracy is slightly lower than the accuracy I read from the balance, anyway, it is acceptable.

 

Another way is to read the digital output directly to labview. But I have to connect the RS232 port of the balance to the USB port of my computer, I have no idea how to read it. Any help with that issue?

 

Thanks. 

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 21
(2,008 Views)

Reading the balance with the RS232 port give best consistence of what you see at the balance and what you read 🙂

And noise it a minor problem... 🙂

 

Get your hand on a 15$ USB to RS232 adaptor, the manual of the balance descibing the serial communication and a connecting cable (have a look at the manual first, maybe you need to make your own)

 

If run into trouble: post a link to the manual and your vi

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


Message 13 of 21
(2,003 Views)

The DMM showed a steady reading because it performs averaging of the data before it is displayed. An oscilloscope would reveal the true nature of the signal.

 

-AK2DM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 Kudos
Message 14 of 21
(1,998 Views)

It only showed 3 stable digits when I use labview card, however, 5 stable digits with multimeter. It is really amazing that average can do so much.

Thanks.

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 21
(1,983 Views)

Thanks. I was asking the Sartorius, which is my balance provider, for an adaptor cable, which would cost $250, insane. I wonder if the cable from other electronic vendor will work, I think it should. Assuming I have the adaptor, I know which pin gives a reading at certain frequency, which is sort of discribed in the manual, how can I read that pin from a USB port. The labview can read serial and parallel ports through visa? But I just can't figure out how to approach to a usb port, and how can I treat that usb port as serial.

 

Your answer is highly appreciated.

0 Kudos
Message 16 of 21
(1,982 Views)

First you should tell us what type of scale you have and if it does already have the RS232 port. 

In the manual there should be a description of the RS232, how to configure the serial port (baudrate, handshake, parity & data bits, etc)

You can't use the USB port directly, you need to buy a USB to RS232 adaptor. Search the net for 'RS232 to USB cable'   *bay starts at about 5$ 😉

Next is a cable to connect the adaptor to youe scale, that could be a standard  cable (next 5$) or not. The scale documentation should tell. RTFM (If not , look if the scale has a CE sign, than the manufactor has to provide the information for industrial items in the EU)

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 17 of 21
(1,975 Views)

I didn't fix it. First of all, the supplier wire the cable loose, so I have a very large variations ( you may need to check it as well). After I fix that problem, I didn't use labview card, but labjack for my convenience. So I don't know how will the labview card perform. Fortunately, I don't need collect data frequently, and I can do as much average as I want to reduce the noise. Still I have 0.5g of accuracy instead of 0.1g claimed by the provide. Another experience is, I don't know why, but it appears that voltage reading is more stable than current reading.

 

Good luck.

0 Kudos
Message 18 of 21
(1,965 Views)

Didn't you tell us you use a 9203?? However ... since you ignored all my questions ... how could (why should?) I help?

 

If you wan't the possible resolution of the scale you should use the RS232 port, all other thinks are AD -> DA (+noise) -> AD ....

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 19 of 21
(1,954 Views)

My last reply was for paperduck. I didn't see his/her post before. Sorry for misunderstanding.

I was using 9203, however, I am giving it up because I think the voltage/current output from the balance won't be able to get the best accuracy of the balance due to the noise of the balance itself. Another problem is that I found I have to do calibration change from time to time if I want to read very accurately from my voltage output. I don't know how did the balance resolve it internally. I am thinking to use the RS232 port now. Thanks.

0 Kudos
Message 20 of 21
(1,949 Views)