03-13-2007 12:13 PM
03-13-2007 12:26 PM
If the pulse is TTL-compatible (very roughly: low state between 0 and 0.5 V, high state between maybe 3.5 and 5 V, sub-microsec rise and fall times) then my suggestion is:
Change your wiring to one of the counter inputs. You'll get far better resolution on your measurement because it'll be based on a 80 MHz timebase resolution rather than a 250 kHz sampling rate resolution.
-Kevin P.
03-13-2007 12:33 PM
Kevin,
Thanks for the response. My level ranges from about 5Vdc to 10Vdc and I would like to avoid the rewiring option, if possible.
I have this data captured in an array. Is there a way to parse out the data that I need (which would be the pulse and time data) and determine the pulse width from that?
Jeff C.
03-13-2007 12:53 PM
04-21-2007 08:42 AM
Dennis,
Sorry for the late response. That did it. Modified the pulse width VI and that took care of it. Thanks for the help.
Jeff C.
06-11-2009 05:44 AM
Dennis, i want to remove the duty cycle and the period from Pulse Measurements.vi I can see that i need to edit the call library function node inside the vi but cant figure out how to rename and save as.
Can you help?
06-11-2009 09:05 AM
06-11-2009 09:13 AM
Hi Dennis, yes i have indeed posted to all forum members. What i am trying to do is use this vi for the second time on a second pulse. As you said previously, you cannot do this because the vi will look for a third pulse in order to satisfy the requirements for measurements; duty cycle and period. I only want the pulse width measurement for the second pulse so ideally i would like to edit the node to only output this value.
I am taking the raw information from a power meter.
Thanks for your help.
Grant
06-11-2009 09:33 AM
06-11-2009 09:35 AM