02-22-2010 08:01 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-26-2010 05:37 AM
Hi,
A few questions to narrow down the issue:
All the best,
03-01-2010 01:26 AM
Rob,
Thank you for replying. The problem was down to the SCSI cable coming loose from the SCXI chassis end ( those connections seem very prone to coming adrift ). The modules then self populated, and the system now works. The system did work very nicely for ten years, but the old Compaq PC's are failing now, and we've only just got some replacement Dell's, but of course they come with Windows XP, whereas the Compaqs ran WinNT, so it has been interesting trying to get Labview 5.1 running on the new boxes with the old DAQ cards, until we get funding for new cards/ Labview 2010/ Teststand. Problem solved for now!
03-01-2010 02:20 AM
Hi,
Thanks for letting me know and for marking the solution for others to see, I can imagine getting LV 5.1 working under an XP machine is quite a challenge!
All the best,
06-07-2010 12:02 PM
Hey,
I have a similar situation. I have this old messy code in LV 5.1 which is running on Windows ME using almost the exact same SCXI modules as you. I tried to get it on a computer running Windows XP to no avail. Do you have any suggestions? What is your application? Are you going to recode in a newer labview version?
-Scott
06-08-2010 02:08 AM
Good Morning Scott,
Our application is to run pneumatic circuits using approx 22 pre-coded special VI's in a front end designed for us in 2000 to run on windows NT Compaq PC's. We don't do the coding thing ourselves, as we are mostly mechanical engineers, running test rigs, and we don't have the time or the will, to learn Labview. We had been promised new PC's and new Labview versions / frontend, but we ended up with some second hand Dells (to replace the failing Compaqs) running XP, and asked to see what we could do, with what we had.
The NI reps told us that LV 5.1 on XP wouldn't work, and if you try to install it, it immediately tells you "wrong OS", but ignore that and install anyway.
The order of operations was as follows;
-Take the XP PC and physically install the DAQ card in one of the PCI slots
-Switch PC on, and let it fuss about the new hardware, tell it to forget about the card, and then get the software ready.
-First load in NIDaq 7.1 ( I think up to 7.4 is OK too ) and ask for traditional DAQ.
-Load in Labview 5.1 ( wrong OS !) . It has NIDaq 6.5 in there somewhere, so that can be skipped.
-Re-start PC and the DAQ card is recognized, and the NI program file structure is created.
-Go back to your ME PC and take a copy of the NI folder in Program Files. Whilst you are there, take a copy of the specific file structure relating to your code or frontend in Labview.This may mean a complete copy of the Labview folders. Transfer these files over to the XP machine, and copy them into the appropriate folders. You can say no overwriting, so that only new stuff is added.
- You should now have Labview 5.1 installed to an XP machine with your specific VI libraries and Labview folders added.
-Hook the PC up to the SCXI chassis with the SCSI cable, and switch that kit on, so that MAX can find the chassis and modules.
- Run MAX using traditional DAQ, add a new chassis, let it find the modules.
-Labview should now run, if you have transferred the files over from ME to XP machine.
We found that we had to fire up our frontend, by finding the "about.vi" file manually. We also found that it complained about missing library files, and so we had to go back to the original hard drive on NT and find those, but we got it going in the end. I'm sure you can too. Let us know, OK?
Good luck.
06-14-2010 07:48 AM
06-15-2010 06:23 AM
Re message No. 7:
I'm not sure what you mean by timing, and if it involves anything intricate within Labview, then I have to duck out, as I don't know much about it at all. Point and shoot user, that's me!
If it helps, since transfering over to XP PC's we have used the kit we have, in anger, for approx ten running weeks,( between 4 workstations) and no sign that it runs differently on XP to what it did on WinNT. Our applications do not rely on split second accuracy, it has to be said. We have rig cycle times between 3 seconds and maybe two minutes. A stopwatch would be good enough!
All the best, Loz
06-15-2010 07:19 AM
Loz,
I just meant the timing of our analog output might be affected by changing operating systems and yes our timing is more critical (1 sec). When you say new kit do you mean a newer version of Labview? Are you then planning on recoding the 5.1 stuff?
06-15-2010 09:30 AM