01-31-2007 10:15 AM
02-01-2007 06:48 AM
Hi Chris,
well it took some playing, but I think I've done it.
I've made a new process model for you that appears to work fine for me.
I've included a new configure report options too so you can setup a second set of reports easily.
You'll have to add one thing though.... copy the "TestStandModelReportOptions.ini" file from the cfg directory into a directory called :
"C:\Program Files\National Instruments\TestStand 3.5\Cfg\SecondReportDetails"
If you don't do this, then it won't work. You can modify where this is with the path supplied to the "Get 2nd Report Options" step in the TestUUTs and Single Pass execution entry points.
Please let me know how you get on. (Or call in to the office and I'll talk you through it - just use the service request number you had previously with me)
Thanks
Sacha Emery
National Instruments (UK)
02-01-2007 03:36 PM
sasha
I gave this some extensive trials using my production test sequences.
This works great and does almost exactly what I want, one thing I can't quite figure out is why a temporary report is created even after execution has finished ?
One other thing is that it appears to be sensitive to which file format is specified in Report options and Which format is specified in 2nd, for xample if I specify XML in report options and ATML in 2nd Report Option then I get 2 reports (both look correct) and the ATML report is viewed at the end of test , if I swap them over then the XML file doesn't open correctly at the end of execution. I think it's trying to use the XML stylesheet (Expand.xsl) to view the ATML file.
Thanks for kick starting this a also providing a real inight into report generation.
Regards
Chris
02-06-2007 04:11 AM
Hi Chris,
just to close the information loop on the TempReport file, I got this reply from the US :
The TempReport is generated to prevent a memory leak by IE when displaying reports in the ReportView control. Unfortunately, there is no way to disable it or display a report on it.
Thanks
Sacha Emery
National Instruments (UK)
05-10-2007 11:14 AM
In TestStand, what stylesheet do you specify for use with the ATML format. I'm trying to understand how to use this, and I found the link http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc20/tii/ATML/Schemas/Current/ which calls out TestResults.xsd.which (from what I read) is the latest sanctioned schema for (ATML-based) Test Results. Just wondering what you used/recommend
05-14-2007 04:13 AM
05-14-2007 06:34 AM
'm not very well versed in style sheets, so I don't really know if trml.xsl provides an appropriately formatted output. However, ust from the header,
05-14-2007 07:25 AM
05-14-2007 07:39 AM
What do you recommend as the starting point for examples/instruction/tutorials, on how, using LabVIEW (8.21), to fill TestStand's ResultList container, such that it has everything it needs to satisfy the ATML schema/stylesheet.
Also, I haven't looked at the schema closely enough to know if there are mandatory fields, but what happens at TestStand if some mandatory field is missing within the ResultList.
05-14-2007 10:55 AM
I saw that TS 4.0 is out and that it is "compliant with Version 2.0 of the ATML Test Result standard"
We are using TestStand 3.5. What version (draft, 1.x) of the IEEE ATML standard for report text is being used in TS3.5.
Also, it seems like (at least in TS 3.5) that the schema cannot be specified (as you can with the stylesheet). Is it true that TS, in general, embeds the XML schema/validation, and therefore, if ATML goes to version 3.0, 4.0, etc in the future, users of TestStand are stuck with what ever their TS version supports (like we're now experiencing with TS 3.5)?