NI TestStand

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Locals.ResultList limits

Mwa ha ha ha ha ha! 🙂

0 Kudos
Message 11 of 15
(1,222 Views)

Hi guys,

 

let me describe a bit detailed what I do:

- I run the client seqence file from a process model from the TestUUTs entry point

- the sequence calls in the client file are numeric limits tests and string value tests

- I haven't modify the step types for those sequence calls, they are original (TS2010 SP1)

 

Flaborde says "add the limits to result list". Is there any option in TS where I can enable/disable it?

 

Not sure whether it is relevant, but I don't have any configuration entry points in my process model. Can it be a problem?

 

Madottati

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 15
(1,215 Views)

...even If I configure the report options with "Include limits", I see the same picture as on my last screenshot. For my unterstanding, this option meand only including the limits in the report file. But TestStand should record the limits in the ResultList array anyway, or?

 

Here a section from the NI TestStand Reference Manual (3-11):

 

Exceptions

TheLimits.Low, Limits.High, Limits.String, and Comp properties are not subproperties of the Result property for the Numeric Limit Test and the String Value Test step types. Therefore, TestStand does not automatically include these properties in the step result. Depending on options you set during the step configuration, the default process model uses the TestStand API to include the Limits.Low, Limits.High, Limits.String, and Comp properties in the step results for Numeric Limit Test and String Value Test steps that contain these properties.

 

So, can you explain me what is meant on "Depending on options you set during the step configuration" ? Which options are these?

0 Kudos
Message 13 of 15
(1,213 Views)

I also checked the flags of the Limits. These are the original flag settings from the NI step type. Still don't see the limits in the ResultList array 😞

 

Limits.jpg

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 15
(1,210 Views)

HEUREKA!!!!

 

There was one step missing in my process model. I modified the Sequential Model, and removed some steps without taking the consequences into consideration. This is the step:

IncludeLimits.jpg

 

regards

Madottati

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 15
(1,207 Views)