Support the launch of an NI TestStand Idea Exchange!

[RayFarmer]

muks is correct, you need to post this on the Feedback On NI Discussion Forum to Laura F.

[muks]

I have done the same here

[bruno_p]

Great Idea !

I support this.

Bruno

[Crusader]

Good idea !

[herrlin]

Good Idea

Idea i would like to see on the exchange:

If a property is going to be loaded by the property loader at run time I would like to see some notation by that property for debugging purposes.

Chill

[Clio75]

I'm in 🙂

[Clio75]

If you have a type def in LW, and import this in TS.  There are and will be two independent incidents of the same type.
So if you change the type def in LW,  the TS type def don't follow.

And I have tried to manually update the type def in TS with the same change, but it don't work as expected.

I was forced to import it again and go through the hole TS and change every entry of the variables using this type def.

[muks]

Please start a new thread!!!

[Mark Krueger (Medrad)]

Definitely have ideas and would appreciate the opportunity to put them up for review.  Our group is moving away from labview in favor of Visual Studio, but TestStand is such a great platform for sequencing steps that we decided to stick with it despite some of it's non-MS-Windows kludgyness.   TS 4 was such a great improvement over TS 3.  Let's keep up the momentum.  Make it so easy to use, nobody want's to work without it! 

- Mark

[Skeptical]

If I were NI, I would be delighted to have a forum for getting the voice of the customer (to use a buzzword or buzz phrase). I think it's a great idea.