03-24-2009 10:42 AM
03-25-2009 10:45 AM
I calculated it out to be ±0.491 Ohms, work shown below. To get better accuracy, make sure you are operating in the 25° C range, and you could perform an external calibration on it and take your measurements within 24 hours of that. Other than those though you are pretty much stuck with this accuracy.
1581 Accuracy of source (from spec pg A-1) - ±0.05%
1102/1600 Accuracy (from ni.com accuracy calculator) -±0.0489 mV at 10 mV input, single point reading
100 Ohm * 100 µA (the source of the 1581) = 10 mV
0.0005 * 10 mV = ±0.005 mV 1581 Accuracy
Total Accuracy = sqrt(±0.0489^2 + ±0.005^2) = 0.0491 mV
0.0491 mV / 100 µV = ±0.491 Ohms
03-26-2009 06:59 AM
If self heating isn't a problem, you can think of increasing the current.
Use an external current source (1mA gives 10x more signal) and spend one (differential) channel for an external known reference resistor (again look for self heating)
If you have a stable current source and you use only one preamp and one digitizer your result depend only of the linearity (and resolution) of the digitizer and the stability of your R_ref
Powering the resistors only for short for measurements is the next step to reduce mean current/power loss