08-02-2007 01:45 PM
08-03-2007 11:00 AM
08-03-2007 11:24 AM
08-06-2007 09:37 AM
08-06-2007 10:43 AM
08-07-2007 09:12 PM
08-08-2007 09:49 AM
Thanks for your response Ima U. Yes, I believe there is some confusion about the question I am asking. We are reading load cells and are selecting "Use Ex for Scaling" on our DAQmx task for the custom voltage channels. We are familiar with and have used the method of dividing our millivolt reading from the bridge by the applied excitation value to get a millivolt per volt value. This method is prefered because it eliminates excitation regulation error. On other systems that we have we read the voltage from the sense lines that are returned from the gauge as we feel that this is the most accurate representation of what the voltage is at the gauge. This value is divided into the read millivolt value from the bridge to obtain the millivolt per volt value. My question is (and was) when you select "Use Ex for Scaling" what excitation voltage, if any, is read in order to perform the millivolt per volt value? Is it the excitation sent to the gauge or the voltage returned on the sense lines?
Thanks,
RRLabVIEW
Certified LabVIEW Developer
Rolls-Royce Corporation
08-16-2007 06:45 PM
08-21-2007 09:47 AM
If this is indeed your question, the answer is, the excitation value you enter when configuring the global channel is used.
You mentioned that you need to use the measured excitation value to scale your voltage measurement, so you probably will not want to check the Use Ex for Scaling box. Instead, you could read the excitation voltage yourself and then scale the measurements based on the excitation voltage that you measure. Please see the KnowledgeBase document linked below for information on how to read the excitation value from the SCXI-1520:
KnowledgeBase 3R0G7CZA: Reading the Excitation Value of Each Channel on the SCXI-1520.
08-21-2007 10:26 AM
Thank you Elizabeth for your reply. I have implemented the reading of the excitation voltage for scaling of our load cell data. The question that seems to persist here is what actual voltage is read when reading the excitation value for a channel? I guess on some of our legacy systems it is the sense lines that are read as opposed to the excitation lines going out to the transducer. Our thought is that the instantaneous voltage on the sense lines will be more accurate than the one being supplied on the excitation lines to the transducer since it is the feedback for the excitation regulation and is the most accurate representation of the excitation voltage after line loss to the transducer. Do you know where the reading is physically made internal to the SCXI-1520 module?
Thanks again,
RRLabview
Certified LabVIEW Developer
Rolls-Royce Corporation