Cluster to Array Node

[SercoSteveB]

What are the contents of 'Array Out' following execution of the VI?

[Kumarhatti]

Ans is : b

[ambaum01]

b

[crossrulz]

B

[RAMESHB]

Ans is -- B

[MrStevenUND]

B

[Asha_Nagaraj]

Ans is B

[sumapatil]

Ans is B

[jagadishj]

The Ans is: B

[mini09]

Bingo B as well....

[SercoSteveB]

Answer: B.  Nice one Kumarhatti, ambaum01, crossrulz, RAMESHB, MrStevenUND, Asha_Nagaraj, sumapatil, jagadishj & gnshmrthy.

A little bit easy that one.  One question springs to mind; why is there no default value for Cluster to Array?

[crossrulz]

SercoSteveB wrote:

                        A little bit easy that one.  One question springs to mind; why is there no default value for Cluster to Array?
                   

Because the compiler knows how many elements are in the cluster.  It therefore knows how big of an array to make.

When going to the cluster, the compiler has no clue how many elements to put in the cluster since arrays can be dynamic in length.

[SercoSteveB]

Nice one GM.  CTAATCM (Cluster to Array - Array to Cluster Master) doesn't have the same ring to it.

This post and the previous one use constants (arrays and clusters) as inputs to the Cluster to Array and Array to Cluster nodes, which is slightly misleading as it suggests that the inputs to the nodes are always constant.  I chose input constants to simplify the delivery of the question (no need to show the Front Panel). 

In reality it is only the structure of the input Cluster that is fixed, the array size, as crossrulz says, is dynamic and will vary.

[crossrulz]

SercoSteveB wrote:

                       

Nice one GM.  CTAATCM (Cluster to Array - Array to Cluster Master) doesn't have the same ring to it.

I would say use LVM (LabVIEW Master), but that sounds a little arrogant.

[SercoSteveB]

LVM is already taken

[adiveppa]

Ans is B

[beautyandbrains]

B

[ashwinilele]

B