Error Cluster Manipulation

[SercoSteveB]

Describe the functionality of the VI?

NOTE:  The False case of the Case Structure wires the error cluster in tunnel to the error cluster out tunnel.

a) Sums occurances of specified Errors

b) Adds a specified numeric offset to 'error cluster in'

c) Translates specified Errors to Warnings

d) Clears all Errors

Additional:  Spot the bug/feature/oversight

[LordNobady]

C

The bug/feature/oversight is that with an empty array the VI reacts as D ( so D is correct to in a way )

[crossrulz]

The intended answer is C.  Really should use shift registers with FOR loops.  Didn't we recently have a question on that?

[adiveppa]

Ans is C

[RAMESHB]

Ans id C. i dont no correct answer  just i am guessing

[LordNobady]

that is a good thing D is just as correct as C in this case.

[MrStevenUND]

C.

The bug is the error cluster input stops at the case statement and could cause a pop-up, depending if you have automatic error handling enabled or disabled in the options menu.

[mini09]

I`m not sure about the answer, The bug might be the Bundle by name doest have the cluster reference of the error in cluster so which may be an another error in cluster. I would be expecting some good review on the answer...

[SercoSteveB]

Answer: C (and D).  Nice one LordNobady, crossrulz, adiveppa, RAMESHB & MrStevenUND.

My bug/oversight/feature was indeed the lack of shift registers on the Error Cluster tunnels in and out of the FOR Loop.

LordNobady The bug/feature/oversight is that with an empty array the VI reacts as D ( so D is correct to in a way )

crossrulz  Really should use shift registers with FOR loops

An interesting one I had not considered is....

MrStevenUND The bug is the error cluster input stops at the case statement and could cause a pop-up, depending if you have automatic error handling enabled or disabled in the options menu.

[ashwinilele]

C