03-19-2014 03:48 PM
Seeing as collective nouns are ambiguous in number, being both singular and plural in nature, perhaps a variant of LabVIEW developers?
03-19-2014 09:28 PM
03-20-2014 10:08 AM
03-20-2014 10:34 AM
@Thoric wrote:
Or perhaps an anti-fideero?
This would depend on the skill level of the developers. CLAs could be classified as anti-fideero. I've seen way too many casual developers that would certainly classify in the fideero group.
03-21-2014 03:12 PM
People new to LabVIEW could be a tangle?
A tangle of learners
04-28-2014 08:20 AM
Wow, can't believe these weren't taken
So, the other question is what you call a group of bad LabVIEW programmers
04-30-2014 07:57 AM
@Thoric wrote:
Or perhaps an anti-fideero?
No... no... I've been taking out the spaggetti from code written by fideero all week...
Let's not give them attribute.. please.. 😞
04-30-2014 08:03 AM
Here's one:
Gaggle-viewers
For a group of individuals who exchange knowledge over a common forum and use a common tool.
From wiki:
In the field of systems biology, The Gaggle is an open source software framework for exchanging data between independently developed software tools and databases to enable interactive exploration of data
05-19-2014 06:33 AM - edited 05-19-2014 06:33 AM
A Local of LV developers?
A Sequence of developers?
😄
(On a more serious note Cluster is the most natural i'd say)
/Y
05-20-2014 01:26 PM
Wireworkers.
Or a bevy of wireworkers if you're not into the whole brevity thing.