09-14-2009 11:34 AM
Without LV installed, I don't get to see the fun code, unless images are posted in this thread.. 🙂
They probably thought that any 2D array data had to be dynamic. 😄
09-14-2009 11:38 AM - edited 09-14-2009 11:40 AM
Ray.R wrote:They probably thought that any 2D array data had to be dynamic. 😄
No, it starts out as a 2D array. Note that the same code is used twice, once for the first column (x) and once for the second column (y). 😮
Here's the entire original code section:
09-14-2009 11:41 AM
LOL!!
Another example of why Express VI's should be avoided... People think there's some sort of majic going on within them..
LOL!!
😄
Thanks for showing the entire code... LOL!
09-14-2009 01:19 PM - edited 09-14-2009 01:19 PM
Ray.R wrote:Another example of why Express VI's should be avoided... People think there's some sort of majic going on within them..
Dynamic data is more like voodoo. Here's the equivalent code refactored. It's a little bit simpler. 😄
09-19-2009 08:34 PM
How to go get a timestamp from a string seen here.
Smercurio provides the non-Rube way at the top of this image.
09-21-2009 07:33 AM
The bottom method looks so much more impressive for his boss. 😉
I remember fixing code by simplifying it and the manager was not impressed. He thought that I had removed functionality just to show off a smaller code. - sigh - 😞
Do I need to mention that the manager was not from SW background.. 😮
09-21-2009 10:11 AM
The valdictorian from my high school senior class was talking about her job as a technical writter. One of her co-workers was bragging about blowing up a manul from thre pages to thirty the same day she had editied one down from fity to 25 whcih caused her to think "If they are doing work then did I just do negative work?".
The next tmie you run into one of those managers, tell them you did that along with using a smaller font to save on disk storage*.
Ben
Smaller font ... less storage line is from Dilbert.
09-21-2009 11:28 AM
Ravens Fan wrote:Smercurio provides the non-Rube way at the top of this image.
It's not quite the same. The upper code lacks all the intermediate indicators ("output cluster", "month", "day", "year"). Maybe they are required by specs. 😉
(just kidding...) 🙂
09-22-2009 08:36 AM
Reinventing the wheel (exploring my computer in a very harder way!!!!!) using pure LabVIEW.
Spotted here
09-23-2009 07:49 AM
Just a sample of something I inherited a few years ago. I still have nightmares about working with this code. It took up about 2x3 screens.