BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

This is Hooovahh

Oh I use the cheap crappy ones almost exclusively for many years just because of the abundance of them.  Other than having to load an older version of the driver (which I saved away) I've never had an issue with them for short term testing.

0 Kudos
Message 351 of 520
(5,706 Views)

I have had reliability issues with the cheaper ones*. Our electrosurgical generator uses RS232 for much of the testing and data collection.

 

*Caveats: I will say that I have seen on average one failure in a entire day of testing from a corrupted serial line. I've also had more complaints of problems from my user base when people are using the cheaper RS232. This is both due to corrupted data and the device disappearing from the COM list. Now, I will also say since we're in the medical field, we're a LOT more sensitive to failures. For most people, having a single line of RS232 corrupt in an entire day of testing is perfectly fine. Personally, I never see this from cheap PCI serial cards, which I usually steer people towards if possible. I think the USB bus causes more problems than anything.

Josh
Software is never really finished, it's just an acceptable level of broken
0 Kudos
Message 352 of 520
(5,702 Views)

@JW-JnJ wrote:

I think the USB bus causes more problems than anything.


I couldn't agree more.  I only use USB when I have to.  Unfortunately, I have to for my work setup from home since my direct LAN connection to my instruments is somehow blocked by my work VPN.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 353 of 520
(5,692 Views)

I was disappointed that NI stopped offering the PCI-6010 for similar reasons, because it would have been a nice way of transitioning people away from USB 6xxx systems that they develop cheap and simple I/O applications on. The number of times I've seen those little used because someone wanted to avoid a more expensive E/M//X/S series card...grr!

 

Also, the 37W DSub was a nice touch for a bit more robustness over screw terminals at the device end 🙂

 

PCI-6010 - NI

---
CLA
0 Kudos
Message 354 of 520
(5,682 Views)

For pretty much all of our devices we use FT232 chip from FTDI, which can convert UART from microcontrollers directly to USB. Never had any problems with them (apart from poor installation, which was fixed easily enough).

 

Recently we bought TTL-232R-5V (UART to USB converter cable) also from FTDI, for "debugging" and i have to say it's very nice.

0 Kudos
Message 355 of 520
(5,652 Views)

So I dug out my old USB-Serial converter to play around, but its drivers are only supported up to Windows 7 😞

 

(My only serial device is an old Metex ME-11 multimeter, so I guess I am stuck with reading the display :D)

 

IMG_20180506_104157262_HDR.jpg

0 Kudos
Message 356 of 520
(5,639 Views)

Christian:

 

If you have the Vision Tools they have a nice suite of meter reading functions you could acquire the data with:)

Plus it is the ultimate in electrical isolation between the DMM and the PC! 🙂

 

On topic- I always use genuine FTDI chipsets. IT bought some cheap knockoff brand that they had problems with so any installation procedures I write specify to use FTDI adapters for any serial based hardware connections.

 

-AK2DM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 357 of 520
(5,625 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:

Cheap USB to RS-232

 

In the LabVIEW world it is pretty common to have to connect to external devices.  And many of those devices happen to be RS-232 or serial.  So a common tool for developers is a USB to RS-232 adapter.  There are several different chips from Prolific, to FTDI, and a few others.  This was years ago when we didn't really have visibility on this, but there are lots of counterfeit chips that are sold on the cheap.  A legit device like this can be a couple of hundred dollars.  But back then we were buying these in bulk.  I don't remember the actual cost of these, or the number of them, but it was something like 50 of them, for $20.  And they came in a large round plastic tub, like what cheese balls come in.  This was the best image I could find of this size of container.

 

717BQwpafqL._SL1500_.jpg

I grabbed one of these, plugged it in, and...nothing.  It wasn't that there were driver issues, Windows just didn't see the device at all.  So I opened one up to see what the problem was.  The dsub connector inside was a solider cup type, and the PCB was shoved between the rows of pins.  The PCB was a two sided board, and had solider points on the top and bottom, with a gob connecting pins to the board.  It was pretty clear to me that the pins weren't making a good connection, and after spending some time fixing it, it worked fine.  So my manager that ordered these sent an email complaining to the manufacture that none of them worked, and the quality of the devices was poor.  I think he was looking for a refund, but instead without, asking for it, a second large tub of adapters just showed up.  At this point he just let it go and figured he wasted $20 on that lesson.  Occasionally when someone was idle, and looking for something to do between tasks, he'd have them repair a couple.  By the way, these were all used for testing, but not put into testers for a customer.


Not worth re reading. ( is there a virtual thud factor or just tl dr?)

 

Lesson 1 use good quality USB Hubs.

 

Lesson 2: why do my good quality Hubs keep dieing?  OHHH. crap! We stuck them inside the test fixture with Velcro! We kept blowing up the transient suppression with the static generated every time we yanked the Hub off the Velcro to connect a new device.


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 358 of 520
(5,583 Views)

@JÞB wrote:


Not worth re reading. ( is there a virtual thud factor or just tl dr?)


TLDR: Manager bought a ton of cheap devices not fully knowing how bad they were.  He complained and instead of getting a refund, they just sent a ton more.  After spending time to rewire, and find older drivers, they all work fine as an engineering tools only.

Message 359 of 520
(5,570 Views)

It no work

 

I usually get some variation of something like this multiple times a year.  

 

“Your tester isn’t behaving properly sometimes and we think it is because of a Windows update.”

 

“Well my tester isn’t on the internet, but more importantly it isn’t running Windows.”

 

“Oh can you think of any other reason it is behaving this way?”

 

“What did the logs say?”

 

“Well we haven’t looked at them yet.”

 

"Next time do that first"

 

RTFM!

 

I’ve also tried helping them out by walking them through things that the issue might be.  A few times I just repeat the things I’ve already told them to look for or to check that have been a common problem.  One email exchange was with production and had about 50 people, some upper management, where they were saying how the test system was crap and we shouldn’t have ever used it and it never has worked.  I’d say “Did you try plugging in the connector?”  And the only reply back was “Nevermind we fixed it”.  NO YOU DIDN’T!  You wasted a bunch of both of our time, made our awesome tester look bad, even though you were the problem, and just dismissed your mistake like it was nothing, while taking credit for me doing the work.

Message 360 of 520
(5,465 Views)