DQMH Consortium Toolkits Feature Requests

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
0 Kudos
JoGra

Convert Event - make the new MHL frame option

Status: Declined
 
After consideration and discussion, we decided to decline this feature request.

 

The Consortium and the DQMH members agree that there's a high risk of breaking things when modifying existing code with scripting. We decide that the  effort needed for this feature is not worth taking that risk.

 

We really appreciate your input, declining the idea does not mean it didn't help us fine-tune the scope of DQMH and reconsider our strategy. Please keep those ideas coming 😉



When refactoring "Request" events into "Request and wait for Reply" events the scripting tools always create a new MHL case. If just wanted to modify the existing event I need to copy reply code, delete the new MHL case and add the reply code to the old MHL case.. 

It would be much better if the new MHL frame would be a checkbox option and the normal behavior is that the reply code just gets added to the original MHL case 

In the helper loop this already works and the reply gets directly wired.

1 Comment
joerg.hampel
Active Participant
Status changed to: Declined
 
After consideration and discussion, we decided to decline this feature request.

 

The Consortium and the DQMH members agree that there's a high risk of breaking things when modifying existing code with scripting. We decide that the  effort needed for this feature is not worth taking that risk.

 

We really appreciate your input, declining the idea does not mean it didn't help us fine-tune the scope of DQMH and reconsider our strategy. Please keep those ideas coming 😉






DSH Pragmatic Software Development Workshops (Fab, Steve, Brian and me)
Release Automation Tools for LabVIEW (CI/CD integration with LabVIEW)
HSE Discord Server (Discuss our free and commercial tools and services)
DQMH® (Developer Experience that makes you smile )