Instrument Control (GPIB, Serial, VISA, IVI)

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Setting trigger level on AUX channel of DPO4032 with tkdpo4k driver

Solved!
Go to solution

It looks for me that there is a bug in the trigger level limit check functions for the AUX INput of the tkdpo4k driver  for Labwindows/CVI (Version 4.3.1 , released  16-JUL-2009) when using a DPO4032 scope.

 

The instruments manual tells us (see  http://www2.tek.com/cmsreplive/marep/14938/071212103web_2009.02.10.14.36.48_14938_EN.pdf , page 77) : AUX IN: Trigger Level Range is adjustable from +8V to -8V.

 

However if I try to set the level to 1.5V  with tkdpo4k_ConfigureEdgeTriggerSource () it returns always IVI_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE. 

 

 Looking into the source shows the following code in tkdpo4kAttrTriggerLevel_CheckCallback() :

 [...]

   if (!strcmp (tSource, TKDPO4K_VAL_EXTERNAL))
        ext = 1.0;
   
    if (ext != 0.0)
   {  
    /*- Trigger source is External -*/
        checkErr( tkdpo4k_CheckRangeWithPrecision (vi, attributeId, value, -1.0 * ext, 1.0 * ext));
    }

[...]

which limits the trigger level setting to +/- 1.0 V. 

The same code  can also be found in tkdpo4kAttrTriggerLevelByCh_WriteCallback() and in tkdpo4kAttrDelayTriggerLevel_CheckCallback()  it is even limited to +/- 0.8 V (factor used in  tkdpo4k_CheckRangeWithPrecision ()  is 0.8 instead of 1.0) .  

 

As minimal workaround I just changed the value of ext to 10.0 and the factor in  tkdpo4k_CheckRangeWithPrecision () to 0.8 in all variants and now it accepts the 1.5V without problems on the DPO4032.

 

 

Can someone @NI make sure that this problem is fixed in the next release of the that driver ?

 

However I'am not sure that my workaround is right for all scopes supported by this driver. I did't check all manuals. You might need to introduce a model dependant limit check here.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(4,427 Views)

Hi markus,

I am investigating the issue you request. The process may  takes one or two days and I'll tell you the result once we have a result.

Thanks.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(4,405 Views)

Hi Markus,

I have updated the source code and attached bellow. You can replace the file to the old one and test to see whether there are other issues.

Thanks.

 

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(4,373 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author markus kossmann
The problem seems to be solved now woth the updated version.
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(4,347 Views)