Unless I'm missing something Linked Tunnels will not work with a Case Structure's selector terminal. The only reason I can see for this is that it might be considered poor programming style.
A linked tunnel is related to case structures. A conditional terminal is related to loops. They have nothing to do with each other.
A loop cannot have a linked tunnel because you are only dealing with a single frame of block diagram. There are no other "frames" of a loop that are hidden or parallel.
A case structure can't have a conditional terminal. I guess it theoretically could, by why? A case structure is already a conditional structure in itself. Why would you need to put another condition at the output tunnel of the case structure? Also, conditional terminals were really more of a way to improve the functionality of auto-indexing output tunnels (although you can had a conditional terminal to a non-indexing tunnel). A case structure cannot have an auto-indexing tunnel because a single case can only iterate one time. It is not a loop.
@RavensFan, I'm not certain if I have the nomenclature right, but please look at the snippet. I have a Case Structure with the input terminal (a condition) wired to an Enum. I want to pass the Enum value through the case structure. Fairly simple.
That makes much more sense. When I read the idea, the title and/or the text was talking about a conditional terminal. I see the idea has since been edited to reflect that he was actually talking about the selector terminal.
My search skills for this forum evidently are not that great yet. I didn't find the idea in your link. Is there a way to delete this or somehow indicate that it is a duplicate? Thanks.
