LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

1003 error at invoke node in .exe

Hello!

I Have a problem at an invoke node when running an .exe and I have no idea what the problem is. There's no problem in the development system.

Here's a picture of the code..

Thanks in advance
Download All
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 9
(3,935 Views)
Both of your figures appear to be the same. You didn't indicate which node is actually generating the error, so I'm going to guess on this: Error 1003 When Using VI Server in a LabVIEW Application.
Message 2 of 9
(3,896 Views)
I don't actually know which node is causing the error, but I know it's some of the invoke nodes. Sorry I accidentally put the same attachment twice.

Our software has a lot of dynamic vi calls. I had some problems calling the vi:s in .exe but they should work fine now. I just added a strip path at the main vi.

Thanks for the link but I doubt it's the solution to my problem. I have LabVIEW 8.5.1
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 9
(3,883 Views)

To find out where the error originates, place a probe on the error cluster wire and monitor the point where the error first appears, it will be the object in front of the probe.

R

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 9
(3,876 Views)

You could post your code for people to have a look at it.

R

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 9
(3,872 Views)
Problem solved! I just needed to add a few vi:s in the "always included" section when making the exe.

Thanks for the help anyway.
0 Kudos
Message 6 of 9
(3,866 Views)

So just to set the record straight Saverio was correct when he pointed at the KB article to include all requred VIs.

Ben

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
0 Kudos
Message 7 of 9
(3,858 Views)
Yes you're right. Sorry guys.Smiley Happy


@Ben wrote:

So just to set the record straight Saverio was correct when he pointed at the KB article to include all requred VIs.

Ben






@Ben wrote:

So just to set the record straight Saverio was correct when he pointed at the KB article to include all requred VIs.

Ben




0 Kudos
Message 8 of 9
(3,854 Views)

@Ben wrote:

So just to set the record straight Saverio was correct when he pointed at the KB article to include all requred VIs.


Now if I could only guess as well when picking stocks. Smiley Very Happy
Message 9 of 9
(3,836 Views)