AI Buffer problem

[Ben]

Start by getting rid of the file writing.

Re: answering your buffer Q's.
I can not off the top of my head anwer those questions without running the risk of leading you astray.

I suggest you do a serach of the entire NI site for those topics. You will find tutorials and whilt papers that will do a beeter job than me. That is one of the nice things about being a volunteer on this Exchange. I do not HAVE to answer every question.

The suggestions I posted earlier represent the best advice I can offer. If you ignore all of my suggestions and get the application working as you intend, fine.

I was only try to help,

Ben

[Romain Monnery]

Hello
I didn't reproch you anything it' all the opposite . I thank you a lot for you help and i understand that you can't answer all the question but i have thought that you could give me information about the problem of buffer because on the NI website it's really not easy to find the good information and the LV help just give a definition of the program but i will search again to find a solution?

I have a last question and i don't bear you again:

does it possible to have a program at normal priority in which i have the initialistion and a loops inside it , i have two or more sub VI ( for acquisition and treatment of signals ) at TC priority and in parallel a sub VI w
hich does the writing process at normal priority? If you need i can send you the new program if you have a doubt but it's just a formel question .
Ok so thanks you a lot for your reply . It was really helpful

[Ben]

THe question about buffers was just TOO general!

If you try to post a question to this Exchange of "buffer" you will get almost 3500 hits. see here;

http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RCATEGORY=&RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=137&RFORMNUMBER=2&RVERSION=1079395200000&BGoToQuestionSecondPageRealButton=1&UQUESTION_0=buffer&UQUESTION_S=1&BGoToQuestionSecondPageRealButton.x=16&BGoToQuestionSecondPageRealButton.y=13

Please post the new version of the code.

It sounds like you may be getting somewhere.

"...it possible to have a program at normal priority in which i have the initialistion and a loops inside it , i have two or more sub VI ( for acquisition and treatment o
f signals ) at TC priority and in parallel a sub VI which does the writing process at normal priority? "

I believe the answer is YES!

Another suggestion:
The LabVIEW General page has many more Enthusiast than here on the the LV-RT forum. This type a question is not specific to LV-RT so I suggest you post some of your follow-up questions to the LV-General Exchange.

There are people on the LV-General forum that can answer much better than myself.

I suggest when you have follow-up questions (unless an answer needs clarification), you post a brand new question and include a link to the original question.

Using this technique you will improve the quality of the answers you are getting. There are few people that will dig this deep into a response to see if there any new questions they can answer.

So keep the question short and sweet.
Include code to support your Q's.
Post to more than one forum if you like.
Keep us posted.

Be patiant!

We are just trying to help,


Ben