02-27-2009 07:43 AM
Which one of the two methods (top or bottom) would you think is more efficient / best performance (faster)?
thanks in advance!
02-27-2009 07:56 AM
02-27-2009 09:03 AM
02-27-2009 09:09 AM
Adnan Z wrote:
The bottom one since Mean.vi is reentrant.
Excellent! Sometimes smaller / more compact isn't necessarily better.
02-27-2009 09:22 AM
Provided there are resource contentions and the parallel function play nice together, a bunch of parallel paths will almost always run faster on multi-processor machines.
If the CPU only has a single core, the results may be different (but that is a point that will quickly fall into obscurity).
Ben
02-27-2009 09:44 AM
Ben wrote:Provided there are resource contentions and the parallel function play nice together, a bunch of parallel paths will almost always run faster on multi-processor machines.
If the CPU only has a single core, the results may be different (but that is a point that will quickly fall into obscurity).
Therein lies the crux. The technically correct answer to the question is: faster/more efficient under what conditions? Would the same hold for a single processor with hyperthreading? That's why I never too much stock in absolutes.