LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Detect differences between cup anemometer bearings in a wind tunel

Instead of microphones, perhaps try an accelerometer mounted to anemometer near the bearings?

 

-AK2DM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 14
(774 Views)

I already did that, using an adxl3xx accelerometer, which was unable to detect any vibration from the anemometer. My guess is that it's not sensitive enough to detect such a low scale vibrations. Do you have any tip on how to properly select an accelerometer for an application like this?

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 14
(768 Views)

Bummer, was the accelerometer oriented in the correct axis and signal conditioning used? 

 

I don't have any tips regarding selection, what is the expected frequency range of the vibration?

 

How about a contact microphone or stethescope type pickup? They may have too limited bandwidth though.

http://www.te.com/commerce/DocumentDelivery/DDEController?Action=srchrtrv&DocNm=Contact_Microphone_C...

 

-AK2DM

 

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 14
(762 Views)

I acquired both x and z axison the shaft of the anemometer, wasn't that the correct approach? What would be the correct axis in this case?

What do you mean by the signal conditioning I should use? All I got was noise varying over pretty much all the frequency ranges, there was no proper way to filter it.

 

The anemometer cups rotate between 4-16m/s, which translates to a frequency from ~60-250Hz. So I should expect something at that frequency and then some harmonics at higher frequencies, if I envelope the signal. Or is my line of thinking wrong?

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 14
(756 Views)