10-20-2017 11:36 AM - edited 10-20-2017 11:41 AM
@Bob_Schor wrote:
...start with one curve, the smoothly translate, rotate somewhat, and maybe get some distortion, ending up as the second curve.
I think that's what wiebe's code does... (have not tried it. Just looking at the picture ;)).
Here's a simplified version of same...
10-20-2017 12:09 PM
So the xy graph accepts complex numbers? Did not know that... Have to check on Monday...
10-20-2017 12:11 PM
@altenbach wrote:
@Bob_Schor wrote:
...start with one curve, the smoothly translate, rotate somewhat, and maybe get some distortion, ending up as the second curve.
I think that's what wiebe's code does... (have not tried it. Just looking at the picture ;)).
It does. The picture doesn't do justice to the vi. Moving that slider works surprisingly well.
10-20-2017 12:17 PM - edited 10-20-2017 12:18 PM
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
So the xy graph accepts complex numbers?
A single complex 1d array (single plot) or a cluster array of same (multiple plots).
My preferred datatype. 🙂
(Btw, I was looking at your code picture, not the graph. :D)
10-20-2017 12:49 PM - edited 10-20-2017 12:56 PM
@altenbach wrote:
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
So the xy graph accepts complex numbers?
A single complex 1d array (single plot) or a cluster array of same (multiple plots).
My preferred datatype. 🙂
(Btw, I was looking at your code picture, not the graph. :D)
Having an off day, that actually turns out quite well. I thing I knew the complex\xy graph trick, but simply forgot. It's in the help, so there's no excuse...
Just like I knew you mend the code, but just had to plug the vi (since OP seems to have checked out permanently).
10-26-2017 04:33 PM
Dear all,
I am so grateful for your efforts and all suggestion. they are really helpful. I read all the comments and I found that my idea was wrong but I learned many things from this thread. I really apologise for any inconvenience.
Best regards
10-26-2017 04:54 PM - edited 10-26-2017 04:56 PM
@Al-rawachy wrote:
Dear all,
I am so grateful for your efforts and all suggestion. they are really helpful. I read all the comments and I found that my idea was wrong but I learned many things from this thread. I really apologise for any inconvenience.
Best regards
It's all good It just goes to show how things get bogged down when you start playing with imaginary numbers.
Altenbach, on the other hand, just plays with the imaginary numbers in his head. But I;ve suspected for a while that his thoughts only touch on a normal plane in a straight line <Insert Rimshot>