05-11-2005 10:31 AM
05-12-2005 12:21 PM
11-03-2005 04:44 PM
Hey Blue Vision,
Did you find a solution to this problem? I'm dealing with the identical issue right now. Any clues would be appreciated.
Thanks
11-04-2005 09:57 AM
In my case, the solution was as simple as replacing tunnels containing the Open DB reference on a For Loop with a shift register. Pretty obvious fix...what a relief!
01-15-2010 05:43 AM
* Chops wrote: In my case, the solution was as simple as replacing tunnels containing the Open DB reference on a For Loop with a shift register. Pretty obvious fix...what a relief!
What's obvious about this? I don't see the logic at all. What's different about a loop tunnel and a shift register that's wired to itself inside a loop?
I did make this change, and it took away the problem, but I'd very much like to understand what was wrong with using a loop tunnel. It seemed like the obvious (i.e. sufficient but as simple as possible) choice to me.
01-15-2010 11:24 AM
This is the basic dataflow paradigm. If you have a shift register or tunnel you have a loop of some sort. When using a tunnel on the first iteration of the loop the reference ends at the tunnel. On the second iteration of the loop the reference is lost (so to speak) since no code outside the loop executes while the loop is operating. If you use a shift register the reference is fed back to the beginning of the loop on the second iteration and everything is fine. Don't forget to use the highlight execution and single stepping debug tools.
Hope this helps.