02-03-2011 07:40 AM
Hi all,
I am currently researching the use of cDAQ for an oil analysis system, in particular the NI 9201 module for AI voltage.
We will have 6 SE inputs which lie within the voltage/current ratings, although they all require differing sample rates. It is my understanding that the module is capable of 500 kHz which will be divided between the inputs.
Does the sample rate have to be divided equally? Or could I for instance allocate 250 kHz to one channel, and divide the rest between the other 5. Synchronous measurement between devices is not required.
Many thanks in advance,
Peter
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-03-2011 01:41 PM
Peter,
If you have the cDaq-9172 chassis there is only one analog input timing engine. see the following KB http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/E7036C1870F6605686257528007F7A72
If you have one of the newer chassis, they have multiple timing engines that could be used for multiple AI tasks with different sampling rates.
In case of the 9172, you can sample at the 500kHz/6ch and then re-sample the channels you desire to have at a lower rate.
Dan
02-03-2011 02:27 PM
Hi Dan,
Thank you for that link, it was very useful. I have read some of the associated DAQmx help files but still have a couple of questions.
I will be using the newer 9174 chassis so will be able to take advantage of the 3 timing engines. My modules are NI 9201, NI 9211 and NI 9263 (AO).
The reason for asking is that 4 of the 6 channels used on the NI 9201 require a sample rate much lower than 83kHz per channel (which is fine as I can resample as per your suggestion), although the other 2 channels have a higher frequency input.
I have some (limited!) experience of DAQ but I am keen to learn; any references would be appreciated.
Thanks again for your help,
Peter
02-03-2011 03:29 PM
Peter,
See my replies to each bullet:
02-03-2011 03:51 PM
I didn't expect to be able to sample different channels on the same module at different rates, but it would have been handy!
I need a higher rate than 83 kHz for 2 of the channels, so will need to add another module. Alternatively extracting the frequency information in circuitry before passing the signal to the DAQ would solve the issue. Although that is a completely different challenge.
Thanks again for your advice,
Peter