07-30-2014 11:55 AM
Probably I am doing something wrong...
07-30-2014 12:00 PM
Another option would be to reshapae to a 1D array and use search-1D-array in the boolean output of the "in range and coerce" function. Here's an old example.
07-30-2014 12:05 PM
@Ivan899 wrote:
Probably I am doing something wrong...
The outer for loop tunnel should be concatenating instead of indexing. I would move the IR&C function inside the for loops and autoindex the original array. No need to create the intermediate boolean array.
07-30-2014 01:37 PM
07-30-2014 01:50 PM
I have been thinking that the row and column indexes are the i values of the two loops, so why not present it that way? And Thanks to Darin for pointing out that moving IR&C inside the loop simplifies things. So now I create an array of cluster of row, column indexes.
Lynn
07-30-2014 03:56 PM
Thanks to you all! You`ve helped me so much!