‎10-05-2010 03:58 PM
@Ravens Fan wrote:
@NIquist wrote:
In 12 hr time there are two 00:00 occurrences (midnight and noon). Is this what you're asking for?:
I doubt that. The way he wrote it, it sounds like he wants military time. Midnight is 0000. Noon is 1200 hours.
In normal time, there is no 00:00. Midnight is 12:00am. Noon is 12:00pm.
Yeah, I just looked at his other threads. It's always tough to help the people who just keep asking the same question over and over without telling us what the motivation is.
Now I'm confused why your simple solution of comparing the dates isn't what he wants. Can't say we didn't try to help.
-- I noticed my 12 hour error after I posted, hence the edit.
‎10-05-2010 07:51 PM
Ravens Fan, ur right.
basically the problem issue facing is to only focus on the "Midnight" (MM) 0000hrs "A new date change".
Once the "Midnight (MM) 0000hrs, a new date changes. the execution "pause" is current running VI and return to the 1st VI.
‎10-05-2010 07:53 PM
thanks on the shown picture, will tk it as reference if can link up with the problem issue at the moment.
nice work Nlquist.
‎10-05-2010 08:01 PM
after some thoughts,
i need help on a simple simple solution that somewhere link with the problem issue i posted...
basically, focus on 12:00 AM now.
Step 1: When a VI runs from 1st VI >>> then to 2nd VI >>>> finally 3rd VI, on a date, e.g. 100825 (25 August 2010)
Step 2: Time and date reaches, 100825, 11:59 PM... changes to... 100826, 12:00 AM
Step 3: As a new date and time hits 12:00AM, its should able to pause the current running 3rd VI. Return to the very 1st VI and runs...
Total there is 3 VIs running in sequence example.
1st VI >>> 2nd VI >>> 3rd VI
so sincerely sorry to you all guys for any misinterpretation caused.
as the task given me was in a mess quite...
stuck with this issue i facing for a week so far...
Many thanks guys...
‎10-05-2010 08:24 PM
One question I asked and you haven't answered is what causes the 3rd VI to unpause?
I don't think you have any problem with figuring out how to do something at midnight, this thread is full of those ideas. The problem you have is a very unclear architecture with how all these VI's interact with each other. Are they subVI's in a larger VI? Are they dynamically calling one one another?
Aren't you really dealing with a state machine architecture?
‎10-05-2010 08:34 PM
basically...
Step 1: When a VI runs from 1st VI >>> then to 2nd VI >>>> finally 3rd VI, on a date, e.g. 100825 (25 August 2010) a folder is created "100825" done.
Step 2: Time and date reaches, 100825, 11:59 PM... changes to... 100826, 12:00 AM
Step 3: As a new date and time hits 12:00AM, its should able to pause the current running 3rd VI. Return to the very 1st VI, a folder is created "100826" and runs...
Total there is 3 VIs running in sequence example.
1st VI (folder created) >>> 2nd VI (data transmit into the created folder) >>> 3rd VI (produce output of the data in the folder)
at the 3rd VI to unpause it, would it be able to unpause it only once the new date folder is created at 1st VI, follow by finished execute 2nd VI, unpause 3rd VI and runs to produce the output?
‎10-05-2010 08:36 PM
so far the progress is done at 1st VI, 2nd VI...
only after the 3rd VI executed... the problem occur of returning to the 1st VI...
‎10-05-2010 08:42 PM - edited ‎10-05-2010 08:44 PM
You say "unpause the 3rd VI", but aren't you actually stopping the 3rd VI at that point and will start the 3rd VI again once the 1st and 2nd have run?
That all sounds like a normal state machine. State 1 >> State 2 >> State 3 >> State 1 >> State 2 >> State 3 >> Repeat until you some other condition is met like a master stop button.
State 1 sounds like a simple action and move on. But what determines when the 2nd VI (state 2) ends and the 3rd one begins?
‎10-05-2010 08:48 PM
You say "unpause the 3rd VI", but aren't you actually stopping the 3rd VI at that point and will start the 3rd VI again once the 1st and 2nd have run?
ya, this the problem facing. you're right.
when the new date changes, a error message would appear "continue" & "stop"
eventually, only when click on "stop" and run again will run well the sequences
State 1 >> State 2 >> State 3 >> State 1 >> State 2 >> State 3 >>
as you mentioned.
Repeat until you some other condition is met like a master stop button.
a master stop button? how this button to apply onto it?
any simple solution for reference ?
‎10-05-2010 08:58 PM
Search the forums for "state machine".
Look at LV menu File >> New ... then the standard state machine template.
As for master stop button, I am asking you to think about what will cause your program to end and break out of its endless 1 .. 2.. 3 loop. Is it the user hitting a button on the front panel? If so, when is it read (state 1 , or state 2, or state 3). Do you have to do any clean up code like close file references before the application's master while loop stops. Now you have a state 4, a shutdown state.