

Hi trishtrishtrish,
I assume you are asking how best to connect to the AI module and how this affects your system. There are three noise sources: the noise of the measurement board, the thermal drift of the measurement board, and the thermal noise of the cold junction measurement. The first two you should be able to get from the specs of the board, leaving the hardest number to estimate being thermal noise of the cold junction measurement.
When you make a thermocouple measurement, your "resolution" is limited by system noise (quantization and random) just as with any other measurement. However, because of the slow nature of temperature measurements, gain and offset drifts with temperature might also be considered noise and hence limit resolution. More specifically to thermocouple measurements, fluctuations in the cold junction measurement caused by changes in the temperature of either the CJ sensor or the actual CJ terminal temperature can also be considered drifts or noise, and further limit the effective resolution when considered over a long time period. NIs TC products, (which you might consider looking into) like the 9211 are designed with very good offset and gain drifts to limit that effect, but the magnitude of fluctuations in the CJ measurement error depend on the thermal characteristics of the installation.
The dominant source of noise (or resolution) in this application will be in the cold junction. Changes in the temperature of the wiring terminals that make up the cold junction will look like measurement noise, and so they will have the effect of reducing resolution. How much noise (or resolution) the you will end up with will depend on (1) how stable the temperature of the cold junction terminals can be kept and (2) over what length of time the signal is looked at. Over a period of hours, it will probably be very difficult to maintain the noise (or resolution). Over a period of one second, it should be rather easier. If we attempted cold junction compensation, the noise (or resolution) of the measurement will be dominated by the difference between the CJ Sensor measurement and the actual cold junction temperature. This should reduce the noise over long terms, but increase the noise over short periods.
If you are looking to make good measurements you will probably just need to build a old-fashioned cold junction terminal block sitting in an ice bath, and use 0 C as the cold junction value without actually measuring anything, then the noise will just be the stability of the terminal block temperature. If the terminal block temperature fluctuates by 0.1 deg C rms, then you would have an additional 0.1 deg C rms of noise. Check here for an image of how the ice bath would look: http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4218 You could also look into an insulated oil bath with an RTd as a CJ sensor. I've seen both of these techniques working well in the past but feel they can be a hassle to deal and you might be better off by looking into a device designed for thermocouple measurements.
Regards,
Steve