02-21-2013 09:26 AM - edited 02-21-2013 09:28 AM
@crossrulz wrote:
I really don't have an answer for your license dialog. But are you seriously developing on 85 computers all by different people at the same time? Seems to me like you could save some money by going to a Volume License Manager and/or order some Professional versions and building executables.
Check the OPs signature. They are doing fine on their VLA
If not, that cyclotron can split a license
02-21-2013 10:29 AM
@JÞB wrote:
@crossrulz wrote:
I really don't have an answer for your license dialog. But are you seriously developing on 85 computers all by different people at the same time? Seems to me like you could save some money by going to a Volume License Manager and/or order some Professional versions and building executables.
Check the OPs signature. They are doing fine on their VLA
If not, that cyclotron can split a license
I only said that because I know of a company that is pretty big in size with a large number of LabVIEW Base licenses. Most of these licenses are used by 3 people for development and a large number on test sets for technicians to run tests. They don't believe that they could build executables to run their tests and save tens of thousands of dollars a year by upgrading just a few licenses to Pro (or Developer Suite) and then build executables for thier test sets.
02-21-2013
10:41 AM
- last edited on
02-03-2025
07:34 PM
by
Content Cleaner
@BVSmith wrote:
We're not licensing Professional on these 85 machines. We are licensing "Full".
But the install dialog still doesn't allow us to NOT install it.And I find it a little strange that you think that 85 installs were messed up some how.
I find your comment about conspiracy a bit condescending.
I read the comment "All it says is to leave the serial number blank if you are installing Professional." and assumed you were installing the professional version. Had you mentioned you were only installing the full version in your first post things may have gone differently. I did not mean to be condescending with my conspiracy comment, I just could not help myself after your reply of "excuse me".
But it really might be a conspiracy, ok probably not. But I did find posts back to May 2010 asking the same question about the application builder in LabVIEW 2009. I actually just looked at a 8.6 installation and it looks like there is not an uninstaller for the application builder for it either. So they must have made the change after LabVIEW 7 of not including an uninstaller. But I have had the good luck of having developer versions, so I never really noticed after ver 7.
So yes, you are right that it looks like NI is just throwing the app builder into the installation when you do not have a license for it with no way to unistall it. I found the help file for 2012 and it does not really help.
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvhelp/troubleshooting_guide/ (LV2012)
|
The instructions for installing the Application Builder depend on which package of LabVIEW you purchased.
|
02-21-2013 10:46 AM
I didn't say which one we are "licensing" because the installer is the same for both Pro and Full so it doesn't matter for the question.
02-21-2013 10:51 AM
Not according to the help file I linked to.
02-21-2013
11:07 AM
- last edited on
02-03-2025
07:35 PM
by
Content Cleaner
When you download LabVIEW Development System 2012 from NI.com you get one installer for both Full and Professional.
02-21-2013 11:09 AM
Bryan.
There is probably a ini token that could be manipulated to stop the pop-up. can you attach LabVIEW.ini from a machine that does this?
02-21-2013 01:57 PM
I don't see anything there, but here it is.
02-21-2013 02:55 PM - edited 02-21-2013 02:56 PM
Try removing
"UDCInstallID="b54fcd92-a4d6-490d-972e-db58e0162742""
That kinda looks like a temp key and is absent in my ini
Let me know
02-21-2013 05:35 PM
A likely suspect, but alas it doesn't help removing it.
Thanks for trying.