Sequence adapter Multiple Numeric Limit Test

[PR_Kim]

I use the Sequence adapter and Multiple Numeric Limit Test. Inside the sequence I also have a Multiple Numeric Limit Test (for the attached example I have used the None adapter). The substep is failing but the sequence is passing

Why is the sequence passing when the substep is failing?

Is there a workaround?

[SercoSteveB]

I have never configured a Sequence Call Step as a Multiple Numeric Limit Test but it looks to me like it is doing what you have asked.  You have configured the None Adaptor Multiple Numeric Limit Test, in your "test" SubSequence to test two values, 9 followed by 5, with 5 always failing.  Then you pass a measured value of 9 back up to your Multiple Numeric Limit Test sequence call which always passes.

[CharlieRodway]

Hi,

What are you trying to do - check numeric values and also pass them back to the main sequence to check there as well?

I'll try and help if you can describe what you're trying to achieve.

Regards,

[PR_Kim]

I am not passing the values back.

Inside the subsequence I might have around 50 measurements that I want to evaluate.

The results I want to return are calculations I do at the end of the subsequence. I have dynamic limits for most og the calculations and I found it much easier using a Sequence as a Multiple Numeric Limit.

Some of the calculations are used as limits for some of the other calculations. That is NOT the problem. The issue is that a failing step in a substep can't make the sequence to fail

[CharlieRodway]

Then you probably need to change your station options -

Configure >> Station Options... >> Immediately Goto Cleanup on Sequence Failure = TRUE

Regards,

[PR_Kim]

That could be an option but not for me. I want the rest of the measurements and calculations before exiting. That gives me an idea of where the fault is

[CharlieRodway · Accepted solution]

If you want to do that then do the Multiple Numeric Limit Test in the Main Sequence as a separate step - the subsequence call will be able to pass or fail and you'll be able to check the returned values before ending the test.

I've attached a modified copy of your sequence file.

Regards,

[PR_Kim]

Thanks for your suggestions.

I choose a solution where I return the state of RunState.SequenceFailed from the subsequence. In the post expression the status is returned

[j_dodek]

Hi

Maybe this example will help.

Subsequence "test" is dynamically collection and MultipleStep in MainSequence is doing

validation.

Regards

Juergen