LabVIEW Idea Exchange

Idea: The Assert Structural Type Match node should be growable (able to expand the number of inputs downwards and/or upwards). This would be similar to how many well-loved nodes can be "grown" downwards or upwards, such as Build Array, Concatenate Strings, Index Array, Merge Errors, etc.

The following screenshot shows a real-world VIM that I created where I would have benefited from this feature. I needed to ensure that three inputs were all of the same data type. This required using two Assert Structural Type Match nodes. It would be possible to use a single node with three inputs if this idea was implemented. This would result in fewer wires and fewer objects on the block diagram.

I am making ever more webservices with labview, but I feel I have little control over the server. It can happpen that a webservice becomes unreachable. Sometimes I would be a crashed webservice application, sometimes it is the NI webserver. But no tools available to find out. I can imagine the following tools in the NI webserver API

- start/stop server

- disable/enable server

- enumerate active webservices

- start/stop or enable/disbale webservices

- redirect domain root endpoint to webservice

- set favicon

- some proxy options would be nice to redirect a domain to a specific webservice

The asterisk (*) that LabVIEW automatically places in the title bar when a file is modified should be placed first not last so that it can be seen when the window is too narrow to display the whole string, e.g. where other programs like Notepad.exe put it when then text truncation is indicated by an ellipsis (...). Some titles can be much longer when they include lvlib and lvclass contexts.

The LabVIEW Robotics Module consists of a variety of sensor and actuator drivers, motion algorithms (such as kinematics), world map creation and search algorithms, a world simulator, etc.

It hasn't been updated since 2019 and is 32-bit only.

I would like to see it made open source.

I believe some or all of the sensor drivers are already available on ni.com/idnet.

There are several other VI-based components and examples that are standalone and could be easily released independently.

I realize that the simulator might have some 3rd party constraints for releasing as open source, but I'd love to see it released if possible.

Let's Encrypt is an Certificate Authority (CA) that provides FREE TLS certificates for people and organisations to secure their websites and servers. Their certificates are valid for a maximum of 3 months, but client applications can automatically update the certificate when due.

It would be very nice to have this functionality in the NI web server. Exipiring certificates are cumbersome to manage.

The name of the "Get Date/Time in Seconds” function is misleading. The function should be renamed.

Details

• The current name does not make it clear which Date/Time it is going to return. The words "now" or "current" are missing.
• The "In Seconds" portion is misleading and unnecessary. The function correctly returns a timestamp data type. The timestamp represents a moment in time that is expressed not just in seconds, but also using lots of other time units such as days, hours, minutes, ms, us, ns, etc. I understand that when a timestamp is converted to a DBL, the value represents the fractional number of seconds since the beginning of the epoch, but this is an implementation detail. It should not be part of the name of the function.
• “Get Date/Time in Seconds” would be a suitable name for a conversion function that takes in a formatted Date/Time string and outputs a DBL that represents the number of seconds since the beginning of the epoch.

Names of equivalent functions in other languages

• .NET: System.DateTime.Now
• C++: std::chrono::system_clock::now()
• Python: datetime.now()

Notice that the equivalent function names contain the word "now" and omit "in seconds".

Perhaps the best new name for the function would be “Get Date/Time Now”. This name would be very much in line with the .NET, C++ and Python equivalent function names. This name would earn the "let's not reinvent the wheel" prize.

Nevertheless, I would be happy with the following names too:

• “Get Timestamp Now”
• “Get Current Date/Time”
• “Get Current Timestamp”

Notes

• Changing a primitive name may break VIs that use VI scripting to find or create this node. This is a downside. I believe that in this case the long-term benefits would outweigh the relatively minor annoyance of hopefully relatively few developers having to modify those scripting VIs to use the new primitive name.

When typing a path in the Terminal (Linux, Windows or macOS) hitting the table key does an auto-complete, this is extremely useful.

I wish the Path control and - let's dream - the path constant would behave the same.

It's probably only applicable to absolut path values.

I've made a QControl that does that, it's a bit basic but it does help, I might post it GitHub if there is interest.

In a recent version of LabVIEW the height of Unbundle By Name and Bundle By Name elements, Local Variables and Global Variables was standardised to 16 pixels. This was a welcome improvement. (I'm fairly sure that the improvement was suggested by a LabVIEW Idea. I would have liked to link to that idea here but unfortunately I can't find it right now.)

The size of Boolean constants is currently 16 pixels (width) x 14 pixels (height). This should be standardised to 16 pixels x 16 pixels. A vertical stack of Boolean constants would better align with a stack of local variables, global variables, or UBN/BBN elements. They would also align better with the default sized LabVIEW grid (16 x 16 grid).

Thanks!