LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Cannot change vi back to edit mode.


@aputman wrote:

If the VI is still running....Ctrl-M will be greyed out.


Or reservedSmiley Wink There I go missing an obvious piece of data and assuming the vi.state property is Idle


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 17
(1,855 Views)

- the vi is attached (hope I did it correctly)

- the vi is not running when I open it

- checked the .ini file nothing in there that I can tell

 

THANKS for the help! I checked with our IT Support and was able to get a backup copy....with a few changes I should be back on track but it would be nice to know what happened. It seem like it is between a run mode configuration and an .exe.  Any other ideas would be appreciated.

 

THANKS!

 

Alma

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 17
(1,839 Views)

That vi seams to be a support file inside a build.  Likely a source distrubution!

 

Block diagrams are removed by the source developers specifically to prevent other users from editing the vi. 

 

Short answer: you don't have editable source code.


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 17
(1,830 Views)

Hum?  Not sure how that would have happened.  Is there a way to back out of that?

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 17
(1,824 Views)

@momof4 wrote:

Hum?  Not sure how that would have happened.  Is there a way to back out of that?


Rebuild the distrubution and redeploy the build without removing the Block Diagrams-  From the original source code.  Of course, then you risk having code on different systems that do different things- That can lead to "unwanted behavior"-  (What an understatement!)

 

What are you using for source code control?

 

Spoiler
The rest of this thead may contain subject matter which evolkes graffically horrorifying images:  Developer discretion is advised

 {EDIT} I I could spell or type I probably would still be stuck programming in some text based languageSmiley Very HappySmiley Very Happy

My command of punctuation sucks too!  All posters are welcome to clairify any posts mangled beyond readability  (But, I'm not the only one to suffer from these things) or ask me what the heck I meant.


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 15 of 17
(1,817 Views)

@JÞB wrote:

@momof4 wrote:

Hum?  Not sure how that would have happened.  Is there a way to back out of that?


Rebuild the distrubution and redeploy the build without removing the Block Diagrams-  From the original source code.  Of course, then you risk having code on different systems that do different things- That can lead to "unwanted behavior"-  (What an understatement!)

 

What are you using for source code control?

 

Spoiler
The rest of this thead may contain subject matter which evolkes graffically horrorifying images:  Developer discretion is advised

 


Spoiler
The response from Jeff is GRAPHICALLY HORRIFYING and EVOKES memories of Spelling 101.  Teacher discretion is advised.  Smiley Very Happy

 

aputman
Message 16 of 17
(1,809 Views)

@momof4 wrote:

Hum?  Not sure how that would have happened.  Is there a way to back out of that?


Run into this all the time with people trying to get really old code converted.  What Happens When I Save My VI and Remove Diagrams?

 

Summary:  You can't do a darn thing with the VI except run it with LabVIEW 2009.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 17 of 17
(1,784 Views)