LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Incorrect timestamps

Solved!
Go to solution

exactly....when I am not recording, i.e. the FALSE case, then, the parameters are : Number of samples  : 500

                                                                                                      Frequency :  50 Hz

                                                                                                          Timeout :  20 sec
and when I am recording, i.e. the TRUE case,then :  

                                                                                        Number of samples  : 30

                                                                                                      Frequency :  10 Hz

                                                                                                          Timeout :  10 sec

 

I think, when I switch from FASE to TRUE during the run, the frequency changes to something else and hence I am getting the intermediate values.

I don't know the reason behind this.

Do u have any idea ?

                      

0 Kudos
Message 11 of 15
(658 Views)

I'm not sure why except the Express VI may be in the middle of taking measurements with the old (false) settings when you hit record.  It should finish what it's doing, but you should see these values recorded as well.

 

Have you tried using the same settings for both cases?  Also try recording the measurements using the false case settings as well and see if there is a difference with the timestamp.  You may also want to try using the DAQMX VIs instead of the Express VI.  These will give you more control.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reese, (former CLAD, future CLD)

Some people call me the Space Cowboy!
Some call me the gangster of love.
Some people call me MoReese!
...I'm right here baby, right here, right here, right here at home
Message 12 of 15
(656 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author chirag.joshi

magic...when I used the same parameter while recording and not recording, the problem was solved....

now I am getting results exactly at 3 sec interval although I hit record during the run...

I don't completely understand why, but thanks a lot anyway for the suggestion.

 

I don't have experience with DAQmx but I will try this option too for future applications..

0 Kudos
Message 13 of 15
(652 Views)

Don't forget to mark the correct post as Solution.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reese, (former CLAD, future CLD)

Some people call me the Space Cowboy!
Some call me the gangster of love.
Some people call me MoReese!
...I'm right here baby, right here, right here, right here at home
0 Kudos
Message 14 of 15
(649 Views)

alright...thanks for pointing it out.Smiley Happy

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 15
(646 Views)