"Where is the setpoint in comparison to the range of temperatures of the chilled water and the warm water? "
If the chiller was stable I would not have to implement the PID. When using my new PID the set point of the chiller will be below the set point of my PID.
The warm side... hmmmm....
From the P&ID it looks like it will vary at the same rate as the Chilled water but it will be warmed by some heat exchangers prior to me mixing it. It will probably be out of phase with the chilled water variation but of the same frequency with an average value above my set point.
"How stable does the customer need (as opposed to want) the temperature to be?"
As is the case with most cutting edge research, "as stable as possible".

The last time I put together a control system for this customer he insisted on plus/minus 1 degree C. But in that case i was using a peltier (sp?) to regulate the temp. I don't think this group knows enough about the science they are studying (super-critical CO2), to be able to quote a number.
"And how much variation is there in the heat load generated by whatever is being cooled?"
As it stands they are try to achieve steady state condtions so the heat load should be constant once everything has stablized. There is one other factor that will intorduce some variation to the heat load and that is the air-conditioning system in the lab.
Here is the GUI Overview screen
A - Control valve pair
B - Chiller
C - Heat exchanger to warm up warm side of mix
D - Temp out of chiller
E - The temperature I have to regulate
What do you think?
Ben
Message Edited by Ben on
07-25-2008 10:54 AM