LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Problem repeating a couple of steps

Solved!
Go to solution

This is what I am expecting for..

0 Kudos
Message 21 of 36
(1,074 Views)

Did you try what I have shown?

-----

The best solution is the one you find it by yourself
0 Kudos
Message 22 of 36
(1,072 Views)

Yes, it works :D. But how can it to flow.. I don't know If you understand me. I want to take it step by step.. like a heart beating rate

I want it to show for 1-2 seconds the first case.. then to execute the following..

0 Kudos
Message 23 of 36
(1,063 Views)

Use Waveform chart instead of Waveform graph

0 Kudos
Message 24 of 36
(1,059 Views)

@maryus66 wrote:

Yes, it works :D. But how can it to flow.. I don't know If you understand me. I want to take it step by step.. like a heart beating rate

I want it to show for 1-2 seconds the first case.. then to execute the following..


You should really slow down in answering and read all the posts. I believe I answer this question by Message 18 -- move your Waveform chart into the While structure.

0 Kudos
Message 25 of 36
(1,055 Views)

I am using the chart, but for the it flows only if the bigger case structure is false, when it's true and the inner case structure has to execute, it only shows the final result, with all the three cases.

0 Kudos
Message 26 of 36
(1,054 Views)

I didn't understand what you had told me there, but if I move the chart into the bigger case structure, I will have two different charts: one for the true and one for the false case and my goal is to show both of them on the same chart.

0 Kudos
Message 27 of 36
(1,047 Views)

I will just unsubscribe from the thread after posting this...

 

heartbeat.png

 

If you want this ^^^^ see Message 18, please.

 

For showing the T/F indicators correctly, you have to move them into the inner While loop yourself.

Message 28 of 36
(1,042 Views)

check the attached VI.

-----

The best solution is the one you find it by yourself
Message 29 of 36
(1,029 Views)

This is what I am looking for, but I don't understand what you mean with:

 

"I still do not understand your goal, but the VI in attachment has a nicer output certainly. Would you mind checking it, please? Well, you basically calculate four values in total in your VI. Could you please scratch a graph of the expected output -- so we can see what you expect?"

 

You said to scratch a graph of the expected output and I have done it, but I don't know what you wanted to say with the first part of the message... Sorry, can you show me the block diagram for your last post?

0 Kudos
Message 30 of 36
(1,024 Views)