05-05-2006 03:49 PM
I don't get what chilly is thinking.
about the scoring, i guess every player plays with everyone else including the random player? (how many matches).
05-05-2006 03:51 PM
05-06-2006 12:54 AM
cosmin a écrit:... I don't get what chilly is thinking.
05-06-2006 08:18 AM
@chilly charly wrote:
For instance, compare the various vi players against CCref, using the following initial configuration,
XX
O O
O O
XXThe result is very interesting 😉
So there is a lot of room for improvements and I would like to see some contributions from other competitors. Christian ? Ben ? Tst ? Shane ? JLV ? What are you preparing in the dark ?
Yes... This is the first trick that I implemented.. By the looks of it, you also appear to start with a similar pattern, with a preference with the rightmost "O". I modified my vi to block your moves... But I have not yet had time to implement suffisticated algorithms, so your vi wins (or rather loses) most of the time. However, I managed to increase the number of ties.
I will probably post an example as soon as I get decent number of loses. 😉
Once again, thanks CC for setting the bar.
Ray
05-08-2006 12:18 PM - edited 05-08-2006 12:18 PM
Altenbach,
We draw every game...

And CC's get's 80+ wins when running first, and ~5 wins if starts second.
Now... why does a CC loss (win) count as a draw????
I'll try to attach pictures

Message Edited by JoeLabView on 05-08-2006 01:20 PM
05-08-2006 02:26 PM
JLV,
I have to confess that I didn't understand a piece of your last post ! Seems that I missed a few posts or is that a "private" discussion with Christian ?
05-08-2006 02:40 PM
@JoeLabView wrote:
Now... why does a CC loss (win) count as a draw????
05-08-2006 02:50 PM
I guess the weaker players will make the winner.
my scores for now are:
against random player:197/190
against CC: 163/112
against KP2A:100/100, no win or lose 🙂
05-08-2006 05:24 PM
cosmin a écrit: ... I guess the weaker players will make the winner.
05-08-2006 05:45 PM