09-24-2009 12:21 AM
Somil it is nice. but one thing there is no delay in the loop it shoots up your CPU usage.
better use the wait for the front pannel activity function inside the loop.
09-24-2009 12:31 AM
Oh, true.
I think putting a 1 millisecond delay will also do effectively
09-24-2009 12:42 AM
09-24-2009 12:47 AM
ok,
but this is what is happening when i use the function
09-24-2009 01:31 AM - edited 09-24-2009 01:35 AM
I think you CPU usage shoots up because of some other reason not because of Wait For Front Panel Activity.
09-24-2009 02:22 AM
Somil wrote:here it is
09-24-2009 02:48 AM
Ya, i also observed nothing with the property nodes. But even if you put them before loop, still you cant observe anything.
Also, see the effect of not wiring the property nodes.(Attached image) even though the property nodes can run in parallel
I really dont know the effect which " limit to single line" would make. please explain
09-24-2009 03:05 AM
Somil wrote:
I really dont know the effect which " limit to single line" would make. please explain
Directly from the LV 8.6 Help.
09-24-2009 03:09 AM
09-24-2009 03:27 AM
What Altenbach was trying to tell you reg the property nodes is that if you branch the reference wire to 2 nodes, they may not execute in parallel. Also for things that are NOT going to be changed per loop iteration, it is meaningless to place them inside the loop & simply keep them running (writing/reading the same value across all iterations till the loop is stopped). Thats is why he told you to keep them before the loop.
Not to disconnect the ref wire from one of the nodes; if you do so, LV will automatically show you the Syntax Error [broken Run button].
Hope this clears something for you...