microphone level control

[wiebe@CARYA]

Does the microphone even has an adjustable sound level? It might just sample, and then leave it to the software to adjust the signal. I'm not sure if there is a hardware gain...

If you can do it in Windows, you'll be probably able to do it through an API.

[SallyAppliedMedical]

---

@bseguin wrote:

Unfortunately, there is no native way in LabVIEW to set the volume of a microphone.

I suggest you to read the documentation of the audio device that you have. They might have a .dll to do. If not, you will need a wrapper from .net to LabVIEW.

Benoit

---

@bseguin, 

Is there any way to access an audio device in LabView using .NET without 3rd party software? 

---

@bseguin wrote:

Unfortunately, there is no native way in LabVIEW to set the volume of a microphone.

I suggest you to read the documentation of the audio device that you have. They might have a .dll to do. If not, you will need a wrapper from .net to LabVIEW.

Benoit

---

---

@bseguin wrote:

Unfortunately, there is no native way in LabVIEW to set the volume of a microphone.

I suggest you to read the documentation of the audio device that you have. They might have a .dll to do. If not, you will need a wrapper from .net to LabVIEW.

Benoit

---

What Assembly and Object do I need to use?

[bseguin]

I know that it should be possible, but I never did that myself.

I prefer use DAQ since the frequency and precision are much better.

Benoit

[pets]

you can try this to set microphone level.

/Peter

[wiebe@CARYA]

---

@pets wrote:

Dupe post

---

Then please post the link(s) to the duplicate post...

[pets]

hi i posted the same thing twice so i deleted the last one and labeld it dupe.

should i name it something else?

or can i delet it?

[wiebe@CARYA]

Usually when a duplicate post is reported, it refers to a new thread posted twice.

If you created a duplicate thread, you can get it removed by reporting it to a moderator (under options).

I did not know you could delete it yourself, but if so that would work too.

I see only one post, so I guess the "dupe post" was redundant and confusing. But never mind, no harm done.