Multifunction DAQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

analog output 200KHz 6025e E Series Card, traditional DAQ, C++

I'm trying to program an NI E series card to perform some analog output at a very high frequency and seem to be running into unexplainable problems, maybe you can answer the below question or forward it to someone who might know?

I need to produce some very high frequency sounds, > 22KHz, and would like to produce them at a sample rate well above Nyquist.

The E Series National Instruments card I working with begins to malfunction when supplied with a high sample rate as a parameter, but when given a low sample rate, say 24KHz, it works just fine. The card is advertised as being able to sample at 200KHz.

I am using the exact algorithm as supplied in the manual:

WFM_Scale
WFM_Load
WFM_Rate(24000, ....... <---- here is where I supply my sample rate
WFM_ClockRate
WFM_Group_Control

I don't get any errors or crashes. A sample rate less than 24000 works fine, anything greater and it appears as if the card fails to output all the points in its buffer.

I can do this after WFM_Group_Control returns (which it does immediately as it is asynchronous) :

while(!wfmStopped)
    WFM_Check(..... &pointsDone)

cout << pointsDone

I will always get a random number of points returned.

Measuring on a scope I see that the waveform is very short and always a random length/duration.

I believe the card is simply failing to complete the operation.

I traced the WFM_Rate function under different sample rate conditions, examing the return values for the UpdateTB and UpdateInt variables. I could confirm that the appropriate values required for using a faster clock were indeed set.  So I don't know what else to do from here except buy a different AD card from another vendor.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 2
(2,977 Views)
The card has a 200kS/sec rate for analog input. The data sheet<> states that for analog output, the max rate is 10kS/sec.
Message 2 of 2
(2,972 Views)