11-15-2012 10:03 AM
I'm thinking you already have an idea for the subVI icon.. 🙂
11-15-2012 10:39 AM
And the name would be "Wait (ns)" or maybe "Wait (~ns). 😄
11-15-2012 11:01 AM - edited 11-15-2012 11:02 AM
Here's a new one for me: Indexing an array by changing it into a cluster. Seen here.
11-15-2012 11:12 AM
Well...
It gets an 8/10 for readability 😉
11-15-2012 11:27 AM
@crossrulz wrote:
Here's a new one for me: Indexing an array by changing it into a cluster. Seen here.
That pops up everywere. I always call it the array-to-cluster-unbundle-dance.
(A variation is the array-to-cluster-unbundle-bundle-cluster-to-array dance) 😄
11-15-2012 12:08 PM
This (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIkzagT97C0) cluster dance?
11-18-2012 11:58 AM - edited 11-18-2012 04:11 PM
Two ways to do basically the same (also note the change in the transpose input).
(I am not going to talk about the subsequent express VI and dynamic data detour that followed in the original code ...:D)
11-21-2012 06:11 PM
A small Rube...
Nothing to write home about...
Seen here...
Obtain measurement values... Create a 2D array of strings. Take a double and convert to string. Format the string to string. Append to the 2D array of strings ... The Scan from string was used to remove the non-numeric values from the string... (ie from: + 200 g the OP wants 200).
Since the desired measurement values are doubles, then why not just deal with that type, as below (which does not contain the entire code... just to show the difference in the latter portion)
11-22-2012 10:16 AM - edited 11-22-2012 10:32 AM
Somebody getting a bit caught up in boolean logic, then trying to make it easier by converting to numbers which are only going to be 0 or 1!
The VI is actually trying to determine the time between presses of two buttons, but it gets stuck after the first couple of presses - maybe the spaghetti gets caught in the cogs
[Edit: included original thread - requested by Altenbach]
11-22-2012 10:29 AM - edited 11-22-2012 10:32 AM
@ChrissyC87 wrote:
Somebody getting a bit caught up in boolean logic, then trying to make it easier by converting to numbers which are only going to be 0 or 1!
Do you have a link to the thread if this sighting?
EDIT: Ah, found it!