DQMH Consortium Toolkits Feature Requests

Community Browser
Labels
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Overview
Get support when using Delacor toolkits.
Post an idea
jdebuhr

Instead of selecting each item to be updated then click update. It would be nice to have an update all or be able to select multiple items to be updated.. Especially when going to a newer version (like 4.x to 5.0)

 

carlod80

Just a very, very simple proposal for consistency, as per what the title says: when a "Panel close?" event is triggered in "External Launch" mode, the module should probably broadcast a "Panel hidden." Status updated. Like this:

 

carlod80_0-1592580299468.png

 

Do you agree or is there any reason I'm missing for which the broadcast was not placed there?

 

Thanks!

CyGa

Hi,

 

When creating a RT Tester, the wizard asks for which modules it should do so. And it lists all modules in the project, even those which already have a RT Tester generated.

 

Maybe only showing the modules which do not already have a tester would help shorting the list ?

j.eggs

Now, when creating a round trip event, the broadcast event uses the exact same typedef as the reply payload. When using a cloneable module, this causes the broadcast event to miss the module ID and therefore any listener to this broadcast event does not know from which module it comes.

 

One typical use case we have which illustrates this is a cloneable module to drive a thermal chamber. The "get thermal chamber status" must be a request + wait for reply, but we also added a helper loop in the module's main to execute a periodic status check and the status update must be shared to everyone using a broadcast event so it can be displayed on a top VI's user interface for example. Actually, if we create a "round trip event" the brodcast event created misses the module ID, therefore the top VI cannot know the status of which thermal chamber was updated.

 

A possible solution I see is the broadcast event to have it's own typedef, composed of the module ID and the typedef of the reply payload.

 

What do you think about this proposal? Do you have other suggestions?

0 Kudos
carlos_camargo

Please create and add checksums for the Core and each of the individual packages.  This is necessary for companies to be able to trust the integrity of software being downloaded.