LabVIEW Idea Exchange

This is a follow on to this idea. After terminals are wired to growable nodes. Make it easier to move and reorder the terminals. The switcharoo tool exists if there are only two terminals but it is difficult if there are more. 

I suggest making it easier with a keyboard/mouse combination or mouse long hold or something like that, to select a terminal. Then let the user drag it to another terminal and drop it. If that terminal is wired swap the selected wire and the one dropped over. If not wired, move the wire connection to the terminal dropped over. 

The idea is simple: if the label ends in a number (i.e. consecutive string of numeric characters), increment that number:

It seems like it only works if there is a space character. If there is a good reason for doing it that way, help me understand what it is.

I linked some similar ideas below. I like these discussions for the most part, but they tend to have broader scopes than what I'm suggesting.

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Smart-er-automatic-label-names-on-copy/idi-p/1873663

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Auto-increment-number-in-middle-of-control-name/idi-p/977710

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Don-t-skip-quot-1-quot-during-automatic-naming-of-copies/idi-p/977300#A2089

It would be useful if QuickDrop supported a way of dropping multiple instances of the same item in one go. It is sometimes desirable to do so. For example, we may want to drop three numeric constants in one go.

The QuickDrop action above would result in three numeric constants being dropped, as seen below.

Selecting an error wire, then executing the sequence: Ctrl+Space >> typing "rn" >> increasing the Number of Items to x3 >> Ctrl+I would result in three property nodes being inserted into the error wire, as seen below.

Notes

• It would be great if the multiplier could be typed as part of the QuickDrop search string. For example, typing "rn x3" or "x3 rn" would then drop or insert three property nodes. This would mean that the whole action can be done from the keyboard, which would be quicker. However, it seems difficult to implement due to the search string needing to be intelligently split into two parts.
• Perhaps a much easier implementation that would be almost as quick would be to type "rn" >> press Tab (this would tab to the "Number of Instances" control) >> type "3".

Thanks

When I was newer to LabVIEW, I found it hard to understand how people could identify front panel object styles e.g. NXG style string control vs System string control. 

I believe it is the sort of skill that takes experience and experimentation, and it only gets more complex when the appearance of the string control is customised. For example, modifying the above controls so they are the same size, they are practically identical...

I have never been able to find a good complete documentation of the differences in appearance and behaviour between different styles of front panel object - seems each style of each type of control has their quirks. So when presented with front panel objects that you did not make yourself, it is hard to 'reverse engineer' them if changes are needed. This makes it harder to learn how to make good UIs.

A potential solution would be to add a property which tells you which style a control or indicator was created as, or most recently replaced by. E.g. modern, classic, system, silver, NXG. An extension would be to add a 'reset to default style' which would behave as if replacing the customised object with an object of that style from the palette. A further extension would be to allow changing of style e.g. in this example from NXG to System via a dropdown box, although not all front panel objects are available in all styles so I can see this being more difficult to implement.

This is probably the ugliest UI mockup you will see all day but I hope it gets the idea across and sparks some conversation:

This would be accessed via 'properties' on the right click menu of the front panel object.

I'm not very experienced with XControls, QControls etc. so would welcome suggestions about how these should behave. Perhaps there is some nuance to do with styles that I am missing.

This idea is related to this one which talks about setting style for the whole front panel.

Let me know your thoughts!

When you get an error from an invoke node or property node, the error message sometimes tells you which node generated the error.  But it often does not.  It'd be nice if these error messages always provided you with this info:

I've spent plenty of time in the past trying to track down the exact node throwing an error, this simple change would've saved me quite a bit of headache.