LabVIEW Idea Exchange

Idea Part 1: The menu that appears when right-clicking an input of the Replace Array Subset node should contain Add Input and Remove Input options.

Idea Part 2: The QuickDrop Remove and Rewire tool (Ctrl + Space, Ctrl + Shift + R) should remove unwired inputs of the Replace Array Subset node.

This would be similar to the menus of several other well-loved nodes, such as the Build Array node.

Real-world example

The other day I wrote the following code:

Initially all the inputs of the Replace Array Subset node were wired. Then I realised I had made a mistake, and needed to remove the third-last pair of wires. I deleted the wires. So far so good.

I then selected the node and pressed Ctrl + Space, Ctrl + Shift + R to execute the QuickDrop Remove and Rewire tool, in the hope that it would eliminate the unwired input. It didn't. I then right-clicked the input, hoping to manually select Remove Input. That option didn't exist.

The only option I had was to manually disconnect the last four wires and reconnect them one input above, followed by removing the last input by dragging the bottom edge upwards.

Having to manually disconnect and reconnect wires was a little disconcerting. I wondered: what would have happened if I had made a mistake with say the second input, instead of the third-last input? A lot more manual wiring would have had to be redone.

Notes

• This idea is deeply related to the following idea: Add "Add Element" and "Remove Element" to the Index Array context menu. However, I arrived at it independently during recent real-world work, as described above.

The Wire Multiple Objects Together QuickDrop tool (Ctrl + W) is extremely useful. However, at the moment it has the following limitation.

The other day I found myself writing code like the following.

Naturally I tried using the QuickDrop Ctrl + W tool. However, it produced the result seen below, which is not what I wanted.

The Ctrl + W tool wires each source wire to a compatible (coerceable) destination. In the example above it wires to I32 and DBL destinations indiscriminately.

The desired outcome would be achieved if the tool preferred wiring to destinations that match the source data type exactly, before considering other compatible (coercible) destinations. In the example above, the tool should prefer the DBL destinations. It should wire to the DBL destinations first, before considering I32 destinations.

Notes

• The example above shows 10 wires being wired between the Index Array node and the Replace Array Subset node. The real-world VIs I was programming the other day required wiring multiple pairs of Index Array and Replace Array Subset nodes, some with as many as 30 wires between them. Wiring them manually was a tedious and time-consuming operation.
• This idea is somewhat related to the following idea: Improvement to the QuickDrop Ctrl+W tool: Wire constant to multiple destinations

The Wire Multiple Objects Together QuickDrop tool (Ctrl + W) is extremely useful. However, at the moment it cannot wire a block diagram constant to multiple destinations. It would be useful if it could.

Real-world example

The other day I found myself writing the following code.

I tried using Ctrl + W to wire the timestamp constant to each of the timestamp global variables. Currently the tool wires the constant to the first global variable only (leaving all other global variables unwired). Therefore I had to manually wire the constant to each of the other global variables, which is a tedious, manual operation.

Side-note: Global variables are used because they are computationally efficient (they can be read and written to very quickly). We needed code that ran in a tight loop (up to 1,200 times per second). The VI above performs the one-off initialisation of the global variables, before they start being read/written to in the loop.

Idea: The Assert Structural Type Match node should be growable (able to expand the number of inputs downwards and/or upwards). This would be similar to how many well-loved nodes can be "grown" downwards or upwards, such as Build Array, Concatenate Strings, Index Array, Merge Errors, etc.

The following screenshot shows a real-world VIM that I created where I would have benefited from this feature. I needed to ensure that three inputs were all of the same data type. This required using two Assert Structural Type Match nodes. It would be possible to use a single node with three inputs if this idea was implemented. This would result in fewer wires and fewer objects on the block diagram.

Idea: The In Range and Coerce Include upper limit option should be selected by default.

Maybe it's just me, but when using the In Range and Coerce node I virtually always need to have both the Include lower limit and Include upper limit options selected. In approximately ten years of using the node I think I used a different configuration less than five times. It has entered my muscle memory that the first thing I do after dropping the In Range and Coerce node is to right-click it and select Include upper limit.

In my experience this point of view is supported by anecdotal evidence. For example, I have recently seen a large codebase that was rightfully using lots of In Range and Coerce instances. All of the nodes had been left in their default configuration (Include lower limit selected, Include upper limit unselected). However, after inspecting the code carefully I came to the conclusion that the intention was for all of the nodes to perform an inclusive comparison on both sides. This was confirmed by a conversation with the original code author. The author had simply been unaware of the true behaviour of the node (he had assumed it performs inclusive comparison on both ends) and was unaware of the right-click options!