Hello Voltage,
I am trying to install VI Logger Lite for a set of machines in such a way that it can be restored via disk images managed by a server (based on Rembo software, http://www.rembo.com/products_autobackup.htm). Restoring machines is necessary because we are working in an academic environment, teaching physics to 15 years old students. Each machine can be used by more than twelve different students each week. Our laboratory is considered as reliable since we restore the disks at each bootup, hence the number of students using its facilities.
The installation of NI software and VI Logger Lite on the first "standard" machine succeeded, without worry. So this image was uploaded to the server and as there was no evident problem it replaced the former one. However our lab technician and me falled into a lot of trouble as we tried to use the disk image from the standard machine to configure the other machines in the laboratory.
We found that there was a wrong link to a database, pointed out as \\mendeleiev\etc. , "mendeleiev" being the name of the standard machine. So we uninstalled every NI software from the standard machine, deleted evry subdirectory related to NI, and uploaded the new image to the server. Unfortunately this results in the error message "Database does not exist in the specified path", when we try to install the software on whichever machine in our laboratory, which is quite puzzling. It appears that we deleted a subdirectory _mendeleiev_, and that the string "mendeleiev" remains in Windows' register.
We tried various hacks to build again a consistent image without reference to the previous installations, without success.
So here comes the question:
is it possible to have a database not dependent on the network name of the computer ? A reference to c:\physic_data would be appreciated for example. If there are some configurations necessarily tied to an individual machine, what is the minimal set of changes to perform in order to transform a common disk image to fit an individual machine? We can forge these changes if we know which they are, via the netlogon script.
Thank you for any advice.
Best regards, Georges.