Machine Vision

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Instability in pattern matching

For both picture use i same settings in geometric matching. Results are but different.

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 31 of 117
(2,843 Views)

What is the rotation setting that you have kept it in pattern matching. I will post you the vi that works.

0 Kudos
Message 32 of 117
(2,841 Views)

- With pattern matching get i even worse results. You see it "pattern_matching_results.png"

- Template file is bit because after i with geometric matching psition and rotation angle find, use i same templae for golden template. My templates have:

 (1) Patttern matching (in case of i need)

(2) Geometric matchin (edege based & feature based)

(3) Golden template (for finding defects)

0 Kudos
Message 33 of 117
(2,840 Views)

i forgat the screenshot.

0 Kudos
Message 34 of 117
(2,839 Views)

Thank you. But that doesn't explain why is geometric matching instabil or gives false results.

0 Kudos
Message 35 of 117
(2,837 Views)

The template that i am attaching works for both the images but i am still not sure why the template that you chose didnt get detected. Looks like a bug to me.

0 Kudos
Message 36 of 117
(2,831 Views)

@desalando wrote:

i forgat the screenshot.


In the screen shot you are checking only for +/_90 deg and not 180

0 Kudos
Message 37 of 117
(2,828 Views)

Muks: when i use your templae get i these results: "results_for_muks_template.png",

 

But when i an another template (just for pattern matching "template_desa.png") get again different results for same settings ("results_for_template_desa.png"). And i can't find all of the patterns.

 

And again, all of them doesn't explain, why i get different results from geometric matching for same images.

0 Kudos
Message 38 of 117
(2,827 Views)

I agree. I thing there's is a bug (ore in pattern matching/Geometric matching). I can give you a lot of examples. Often get different results for same images.

0 Kudos
Message 39 of 117
(2,823 Views)

As i mentioned earlier you are still checking only for +/- 90  degrees. Change it to 180

0 Kudos
Message 40 of 117
(2,821 Views)