LabVIEW Idea Exchange

Community Browser
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Post an idea

(NOTE: This idea is the opposite of this one, so not the same)

 

The properties page of "boolean array to number" should prominently include the sign extension mode so we don't run into this confusion.

 

altenbach_1-1750952300236.png

 

 

altenbach_0-1750952204508.png

 

 

 

Bug replication steps:

  • Ensure that the "Connector pane terminals default to Required" option is ticked (found in Tools >> Options >> Front Panel).
  • Connect an indicator to a VI's connector pane.
  • Right-click the indicator and select "Change to Control".
  • The indicator changes to a control, but the connector pane terminal is Recommended. It should be Required (should obey the environment setting).

Notes

  • Mis-connecting an indicator to the connector pane while believing it is a control can occur moderately frequently, especially when working with front panel elements that do not look very different when they are controls vs. indicators, for example: variants, objects, typedef clusters, system-style strings or paths.

1 (edited).png

For string controls and indicators please add a vertical alignment option. We have applications where we will programmatically change the font size, which requires a string control/indicator to be sized for the largest option. Since there isn't a vertical alignment option, the string is always aligned to the top and it can make the front panel layout look strange.

 

Other applications have long strings that may be a single line or may be a variable number of multiple lines, but we'd like to be able to center the text vertically. Again, this requires the control/indicator to be sized for the largest option, but all the text is always vertically aligned to the top of the front panel object.

Idea Part 1: The menu that appears when right-clicking an input of the Replace Array Subset node should contain Add Input and Remove Input options.

Idea Part 2: The QuickDrop Remove and Rewire tool (Ctrl + Space, Ctrl + Shift + R) should remove unwired inputs of the Replace Array Subset node.

 

2 (edited).png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This would be similar to the menus of several other well-loved nodes, such as the Build Array node.

 

Real-world example

The other day I wrote the following code:

1.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initially all the inputs of the Replace Array Subset node were wired. Then I realised I had made a mistake, and needed to remove the third-last pair of wires. I deleted the wires. So far so good.

 

I then selected the node and pressed Ctrl + Space, Ctrl + Shift + R to execute the QuickDrop Remove and Rewire tool, in the hope that it would eliminate the unwired input. It didn't. I then right-clicked the input, hoping to manually select Remove Input. That option didn't exist.

 

The only option I had was to manually disconnect the last four wires and reconnect them one input above, followed by removing the last input by dragging the bottom edge upwards.

 

Having to manually disconnect and reconnect wires was a little disconcerting. I wondered: what would have happened if I had made a mistake with say the second input, instead of the third-last input? A lot more manual wiring would have had to be redone.

 

Notes

The Wire Multiple Objects Together QuickDrop tool (Ctrl + W) is extremely useful. However, at the moment it has the following limitation.

 

The other day I found myself writing code like the following.

1 (edited).png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Naturally I tried using the QuickDrop Ctrl + W tool. However, it produced the result seen below, which is not what I wanted.

2 (edited).png

 

The Ctrl + W tool wires each source wire to a compatible (coerceable) destination. In the example above it wires to I32 and DBL destinations indiscriminately.

 

The desired outcome would be achieved if the tool preferred wiring to destinations that match the source data type exactly, before considering other compatible (coercible) destinations. In the example above, the tool should prefer the DBL destinations. It should wire to the DBL destinations first, before considering I32 destinations.

Notes

  • The example above shows 10 wires being wired between the Index Array node and the Replace Array Subset node. The real-world VIs I was programming the other day required wiring multiple pairs of Index Array and Replace Array Subset nodes, some with as many as 30 wires between them. Wiring them manually was a tedious and time-consuming operation.
  • This idea is somewhat related to the following idea: Improvement to the QuickDrop Ctrl+W tool: Wire constant to multiple destinations

I don't use conditional disable structures very often...but when I do, I've always found it a bit annoying that I need to pull up the documentation in order to check what the available options are, and expected string formatting. For symbols with a defined list, why not expose these options through drop-downs?

 

_carl_0-1634052992681.png

 

Preamble:

Just following up on a sub-idea raised within this recent idea from tst: LabVIEW should break VIs which have hidden code.  I *almost* like tst's idea, but IMO it is a bit too heavy-handed:

  • YES, I want better information when there is hidden code on my diagram, but...
  • NO, I don't want my code to break!

 

The Idea:

If a structure hides code beyound it's boundary, then provide a visual indication. For example, the edge of the structure could be coloured red to alert the user that something unexpected is going on.

hiddenCode.png 

I may want to use it 0-5% of the time.

However, I want to scroll through cases in a structure 95% of the time.

 

Making the 5% use case the default (ctrl-scroll) was a bad design choice.

Reverse it before it's ingrained.

 

(ctrl-shift-scroll is frankly awkward and imagine will become painful eventually)

 

 

Make Nigel AI advisor able to analyze changes within git repo and suggest a commit message.

 

This would be useful to : 

  • Make commit messages more relevant / use message conventions
  • Avoid undesired changes
  • Avoid undocumented changes

I just realized that when creating an interface you cannot create property node folders.

 

You can see from the pictures below that option is missing from interfaces.

 

second.pngfirst.png

 

You can also see from that screenshot that it is possible to have property folders in interfaces and they work just fine. You have to edit the xml to do that, but it works. So it is implemented, it is just removed from the IDE.

 

Now I talked to Darren and he seemed to think the original reasoning was "Well property nodes are for storing things in the class private data and there is no private data with an interface, so you don't need them." I can't really argue with that logic, however, there are times when an existing class uses a property node and you want to create an interface that includes that method. For example you may have multiple instruments that have a VISA ref property. You currently can't create an interface with that "write VISA ref" VI (without editing the xml.) If you create a method with the same name/conn pane and it is not in a property folder, the compiler complains. Now you could just go back and edit the original class and remove the property node and just use a regular method. However then you break every piece of calling code that is using a property node.

 

Here is a use case, which I think is fairly common - it happens to me a lot:


I inherit some code. It is using some particular instrument (Oscope, DMM doesn't matter) They want to support another similar instrument (maybe newer version of the DMM).

 

The instrument code is wrapped in a class. Great. As a first step, I can refactor. I can create an interface that has all the same methods and make the code rely on the interface. If it is a class wrapped in a DQMH module, all I have to do is replace the object in the Shift register with the interface and somewhere set the concrete class in the initialize. It all works exactly the same as before, but now I have an interface.

 

Then I create another class that implements that interface and add some logic to pick which one - some kind of factory. Done. I've made very minimal changes to the existing code and it now supports a different instrument. This is the holy grail of OOP. I create a new class and just inject it and everything works.

 

Not so fast. NI has decided I shouldn't be able to do this if the class uses a property node (oh no!) why? I should be able to have 2 classes that both have the same property. Sure the data's not getting stored in the interface, but what does that matter?

 

It does matter to the compiler. If I want to do what I proposed above and the original developer used property nodes anywhere this doesn't work directly. I have to either do some xml hack on the interface or I have to replace all the property nodes in the calling code with subvi calls and then go edit the class and remove the property folders. Why?

 

It seems like all that is needed is enabling the right click menu, because if you manually edit the xml, it all works. That is already implemented for classes, so I imagine the fix would be rather simple.

A number of people, myself included, have found it necessary to parse ISO-8601 time strings into time values. The ISO standard has a lot of options, so a complete solution is pretty time-consuming. It would be nice if the string parsing functions in LabVIEW included a format specifier that allowed parsing of ISO-8601 time strings directly.

As part of everyday class development, I often want to track down everywhere where certain class data is being used. Would be convenient if there was a shortcut for doing this...perhaps something like:

 

_carl_1-1678141878195.png

 

 

Problem: Many native VIs use the Non-reentrant execution reentrancy setting.

 

Solution: The vast majority of native VIs should use the Preallocated clone reentrancy setting.

  • The native VIs that need to use Non-reentrant or Shared clone are few and far between - they should be identified on a case-by-case basis. Their Context Help and/or Detailed Help should explain why they need to be set to Non-reentrant or Shared clone.

The following is a selection of vi.lib VIs that should use Preallocated clone. This selection is meant to serve as a starting point and is not comprehensive.

 

1.png

2.png

3.png

 

Notes:

  • This idea is related to: The reentrancy of new VIs should be "Preallocated clone" . They both argue in favour of using the Preallocated clone setting more.
  • A significant number of native VIs are already configured to use Preallocated clone, which is great.
  • There are curious cases where closely related VIs are set to different reentrancy settings. For example, Color to RGB.vi is rightly using Preallocated clone, while RGB to Color.vi is Non-reentrant. Similarly, Trim Whitespace.vi is rightly Preallocated clone, while Normalize End Of Line.vi - which lives next to it on the String palette - is Non-reentrant.
    • This suggest that the reentrancy setting of some native VIs was chosen haphazardly. This needs to be rectified.
  • The fact that so many native VIs are non-reentrant partly defeats LabVIEW's remarkable ability to create parallel code easily. Loops that are supposed to be parallel and independent are in fact dependent on each other when they use multiple instances of these non-reentrant native VIs. When an application uses multiple instances of these native VIs it is as if there are "hidden semaphores" that are added between the various call locations that call these native VIs. This leads to less performant applications (more CPU cycles, longer execution time, larger EXE compiled code size).

Please implicitly consider array index during index / replace elements in In Place Elements Structure if I am starting from Index 0

 

Present method:
image.png

 

Expected method:
image (1).png

 

[admin edit 2021-02-24]: placed images in-line with text and removed them as attachments

When using the Rearrange Cases window with a Type Specialization Structure, the case list only shows either Declined, Accepted or Ignored. This makes it difficult to know what cases are being reordered. Similar situations occur with a numeric case selector (just a list of numbers) and event cases (dynamic events with the duplicate default wire labels).

 

rearrange-subdiagram.png

This idea is to add the subdiagram label of a case next to each entry in the case list. This would add some context to each item, and make rearranging cases quicker and less error prone.

 

rearrange-subdiagram-labels.png

Alternately (or in addition to the above) would be the ability to preview the contents of the selected case / subdiagram, much like the preview when selecting a dynamic dispatch VI in a class hierarchy. This would be useful for cases with no subdiagram label, or in the case of the type specialization structure, allow visual comparisons of which case should be evaluated in which order.

 

rearrange-subdiagram-labels-preview.png

It would be nice to get 64bit references. The old 32bit references are build up from two main parts: the descriptor represented on 12bits and the address represented on 20bits. If the application requires more than the available 1048576 references the labview generates an error because the memory is full. The workaround is to close references found in the memory. If an application requires serialization, this rule should be kept in mind. If the application serializes references by an input data, the input data should be limited, which means that really big data can't be handled although the machine have enough memory to handle them. Unfortunately, this feature in the labview has been not changed in the last 30 years although 64bit processor architectures are used world-wide and the 64bit labview plays a bigger role every year.
I think, the main reason is the backward compatibility...but is it possible to provide 64bit references which could be chosen by the developer itself, where the descriptor field will not be changed but additional 32bits are available for addressing? e.g. new option in the labview settings "use 64bit references" or selection (polymorphic) from all native components which could be create a reference. If the feature is supported by (environment) settings, then the compiler uses it generic. If the feature is supported component level, then the references should be checked for conflicts. At the end the architect/developer/application is no more limited inside in the labview because the available 4503599627370496 addresses are more than enough for a long time again.

I started a discussion here

 

Although the suggestion about using a template is quite nice, I would still like to be able to create a new VI (or sub-VI) from within a project.  I never use the default icon provided by NI.  -- N-E-V-E-R --   That's a personal choice. 

 

So since I never use that icon, the fact that creating a new VI which auto-generates an icon that is never used, renders that feature useless.  Let's see how many users of LabVIEW also find the default icon useless....  (Kudos would be a way to take a poll).

 

A nice feature would be to allow the developer to create her / her own default icon.  The default icon is probably somewhere in the ini file (I have not checked).  One of the Options could be to select if the user wants to use their own default, and if so, browse to the icon or have an editor create one.

 

In my case, when creating a new VI, it ends up with a icon like this:

 

 

 

I would be happy to have a default icon that looks like this:

 

 

 

The idea I am proposing is that developers should be able to have the icon of their choice as a default icon.

 

And may plenty of kudos adorn this thread..  🙂

 

Spoiler
 

 

Currently, when you right-click -> "Make Type Def" on a control / constant in a library VI, the new unnamed type definition is created outside

the library.

Also, it has the default control icon: raphschru_0-1665514290538.png

instead of a library control icon:       raphschru_4-1665514883384.png

 

This leads to 3 additional tasks:

1. Drag and drop the control inside the library from the project explorer.

2. Edit the control icon to make it have the library control icon (with the horizontal slider glyph).

This is annoying because you need to copy it from another library control icon.

3. Go to the library properties and make "Apply Icon To VIs".

 

Bonus bug: If your new type contains a library-private subtype, the new control magically disappears from the project explorer when you click on it.

 

In comparison, the "Create SubVI" function works perfectly inside a library, i.e. it creates a VI inside the library and with the icon banner.

I think the "Make Type Def" function should behave the same to make library development more coherent and intuitive.

The Deployment Progress window should display the amount of time that has elapsed since the deployment started. The screenshot below shows a possible implementation.

 

1 (edited).png

Notes

  • Please ignore the arrow that points at "Deployment completed with errors". I had to reuse this screenshot which was originally created to serve a different topic.
  • This idea is similar to the following idea: The Build status window should display elapsed time. I created two separate ideas for the purpose of keeping each idea small and self-contained.

The title says it all.

In 2021 there was excitement about improvements to LVCompare and LVMerge, however there is still no way to compare classes or libraries.

I'm ok with not merging. I know that is a minefield. But at least show me what methods were added, what library or class settings were changed, which VIs moved from private to public and for classes, diff the private data and maybe show changes to the class heirarchy?