NI TestStand Idea Exchange

Community Browser
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Post an idea

When you are running an execution and you want to check if a step will execute or not depending on the precondition you have to go to the step, browse to the precondition, copy it and paste it in the Watch View...

 

Wouldn't it be great if you could add your step precondition the the watch view with a single click (like VS "Add Watch")... ideally I'd have another entry in the menu below called "Debug" ot "Watch View" with submenu-items: "Add Precondition to Watch View", "Add Pre-expression to Watch View", "Add Pre-expression to Watch View"

 

ideaxchange.png

 

Vote for me!!!

 

<<- N --.>

Right now it is pretty easy (Thanks guys!!!) to go from a variable that is of a custom type, and find it in the types palette.

viewtype.png

 

This is great, and it should just stay the way it is.

The problem comes when you have an array of type "FOO".  When you try to do this trick on the array of type FOO, it doesn't work.  Arrays of type "Foo" are common enough, and it would be great to be able to go directly to the type definition for the array element, something like this:

 

viewtypearray.png

(I could see removing the "Types" selection right above the new element circled in red -- it has limited functionality even now).

 

Since TS. 4.5 there is support for .net generics  

For me this was one of the biggest advancement of this release !

For future release it would we nice to have support in the foreach StepType to iterate

though the collection in state-of-art way.

 

At the moment you have to get the size and then use a for-loop

with indexing you desiered element. For doing this you have to use at least

two statements. With foreach and collection support no statement is neccessary.

 

Regards

 

Juergen

 

 

Hi,

 

Many times I need to run the MainSequence after a change somewhere in a subsequence. Because there is no shortcut key for that action (First go to the MainSequence then Execute->Run MainSequence) it is pretty time consuming. It would be nice to have that shortcut key in TestStand.

 

Best Regards,

Jick

Hello all TestStand fans, 

 

For my recent project i had to modify the frontEnd callback.

 

=> According to the TestStand help, the only path where this file can be created is in TestStand default path or in the corresponding user path.

.... But no where else !!!! Smiley Mad

 

It would be nice to be abble to configure the frontEndCallback path in the configure options !

 

=> Doing so, the path of this callback could be placed everywhere ! (In the configuration path would be nice !)

=> Doing so, it would be possible to create a frontendcallback for each configuration !

 

I am a TestStand developper, a NI partner, not a TestStand end user.

My work is to provide custom sequencer for my customer.

On my computer i had to manage many different sequencer !

 

  • If file are threated as global ... i had to customize my computer to switch among my different sequencers ! (Or to create virtual PC's : Virtual box / VmWare ... ) Smiley Mad

 

  • If all TestStand configuration files where identified in the "Configuration directory", my only work to switch from 1 project to an other would be to point on a different Configuration path ! Smiley Very Happy

I think that if it is impossible to do so, today, is because this callback is loaded before the "Station configuration" is loaded ?  

 

My ideas should be applyed to all global files ...

  • Station callbacks
  • Localization file
  • ... i dont't know the behaviour of all files !

 

  • Please get rid off all "Global files" ! Smiley Sad
  • Replace them by files, with path configuration in the "Station options" ... and located in the "Configuration path" Smiley Happy

Doing so, will also simplify the deployement process !!!! Smiley Happy

=> A single path copy ... is quite easyer as a complicate deployment process ! Smiley Wink

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Manu.net

 

When profiling an sequence, it's would be useful if also the version of .NET DLL that was loaded/unloaded could be displayed in the report in a new column next to Item Name. I have not found a way to do do this. I think this would be helpful to be able to compare performance of different versions of DLL:s, and also when troubleshooting sequences (e.g. when adding search directories and wrong version of a DLL is used by mistake).

 

Currently the only way I found to see version loaded was using tools like Visual Studio or Process Explorer, but that's run time, requiring breakpoints etc - the above approach would provide an better overview of the execution, and is more convenient.

 

 profiling.png

As it can be done in Expression Browser, it is very helpful if we can use Step Name instead of Unique ID with Precondition builder!

 

Precondition Builder Improvement.png

 

Can you specify Step ID.png

Currently, the step icon for a custom step type is defined statically:

 

2016-03-04_144812.png

 

 It would be nice if the step icon could also be specitied via expression.  This would allow step types where the step icon changes based on the configuration.  For example, the lock step could be made more intuitive:

 

Current static icon:

2016-03-04_142247.png

 

With dynamic icons:

lockIconExample.png

 

To accomplish this currently, you need to update the icon for the step via the API in the edit substep, which is cumbersome and adds coupling between the edit substep code and the icon names.

The menu to create a new variable (right click on variable in an expression edit control and select Create "VariableName") contains all the data types you can use for the variable, however, in the LabVIEW Panel (and other similar panels or dialogs) there is enough context information about the variable to suggest a data type, for example, if the variable is in a control of type Double we know we should create a Numeric variable. TestStand should add the contextual suggestions to the top of the context menu and bold them so that I can more quickly select the data type I want most of the times, then have a separator and put the normal menu so if I don't want that data type for some reason I can still choose the other data types (see attached image).

I'd like to see a "No Comparison" comparison type added to the String Value Test.

 

Currently there are only two options for comparison type on the String Value Test: "CaseSensitive" and "IgnoreCase".  I have often wished there was a "No Comparison" option similar to what is available for the Numeric Limit Test.  Sometimes you want to pass a string to the test report in the result field that neither passes nor fails the test.

Hi,

 

Expose the sequence file version number to be visible in the file properties. (select file in windows explorer -> right click -> properties -> details).

 

When for example we do right click -> properties -> details tab on .dll assembly we see:

 

FileVer.PNG

 

When we do the same on the .seq file we see:

 

FileVer2.PNG

 

Exposing sequence file version number can simplyfy checking  version file number. Now to chek it we have to open sequence file in editor.

 

 

The current method of viewing the contents of a 2D array variable can be difficult to read if you have many elements.  My suggestion is to add a feature that allows a right click on the 2D array variable and select a popup to see the array in a row/column format.  It would be nice to able to edit the contents with this view as well.

 

I have uploaded an image of a TestStand view of an array and a LabVIEW view for comparison.  Looking at the LabVIEW version, by having the contents in a row/cool format, adding the scroll bars and index display, I can easily see my array contents.

Download All

Hi,

 

Exactly as in subject.

 

I thought that it will be good if the developers could collapse blocks of code which are in between of the Flow Control or/and Synchronisation step types.

 

I think about the mechanism we know already from TestStand which hides block of code: i.e. Setup, Main, Cleanup section in the sequence, or it can hide variables. It is a little "+" and little"-" to expand the content of the type of variables.

 

Capture333.PNG  Capture444.PNG

 

The types of steps I think of were mainly types from Flow Control and some types from Synchronisation. It would be good if for example we could collapse If-Else-ElseIf-End, Select-End, Case-End, While-End, DoWhile-End, etc statements

 

I think this functionality could improve the readability of the sequence, and helps the developers to have a better view on the whole sequence.

 

In TestStand you can create a comment in a variable, but that comment will be deleted even if the data type of the variable is changed. This does not make too much sense because it happens that the customer needs to change  the data type, and then he has to re-write the comment completely. This feedback comes straight from multiple customers and it makes sense that it should be so.

 

Thank you everybody. Best,

 

Corrado

Current shortcuts for TestStand include Ctrl-D to close executions and Ctrl-F4 to close a sequence file. However, both of those windows show up as tabs in the current GUI layout.

 

Every modern internet browser allows the user to close a tab with Ctrl-W. This would also be a neat feature when only trying to close one report at a time when viewing the results from multiple UUTs, instead of closing all reports by closing all executions with Ctrl-D.

I think it's time to improve condition builder --

 

The features of it are rather limited right now -- All I can do is AnyOf and AllOf.    What I want to do is NoneOf and OneOf.  To some extent I can "DeMorgan" myself to get to these, but that often makes it less logical to read -- and condition builder is all about making it easy to read crazy long complicated conditions.

 

If we can get new functions added to TestStand (like NoneOf and OneOf as sisters to AnyOf and AllOf), and those functions supported by the condition builder, that would be great.  (this means the "Insert XXXX" button and "change to XXX" buttons would rpboably need to be rearchitected since there would be too many choices there).

 

Another idea with Condition Builder would be to support "Negating" a condition.  This way I could choose "Insert AllOf", highlight it, and choose "Negate" and it would change to "! AllOf:"

 

I could ALMOST do this negating manually now in the expression after the building of it (use condition builder, choose OK, then manually tweak the expression to add my !'s), except that once condition builder now sees !AllOf() it won't process the expresion anymore and split it into the condition tree.

 

How about something like this:

condition builder change.png

 

 

It would be nice having feature to update sequence call names automatically

 

 23520iF0E0B5654DD74F4E

 

Why ?

When ever you create (or copy, too) a sequence call step

you have to rename it from "SequenceCall" to another name.

Mosttime the name of the Sequence is is in relation to the sequence.

For Example: You a have a Sequence "ABC" then the Step to it will be most "Call ABC"

So if there is a relation you should be able to rename it automatically.

 

Regards

 

Juergen

LabVIEW recognizes any cluster of <Bool, I32, String> as an error cluster.  TestStand should recognize this as well and default any such cluster output to Step.Result.Error.

 

With the addition of the Silver controls in LabVIEW 2012 "error out" was changed to follow the style guide recommended naming convention of leading caps and is now labled "Error Out"  which is not intercepted and assigned to step.result.error.

Hi,

 

Exactly as in the subject.

 

Sometimes the names variables are long and could be deeply nested into containers.

 

Now it is difficult to use them as both windows: the main one and Selected are unresizable.

 

After proposed change the property loader would have all default features(behaviours) as you can expect from the window at this place.

 

Current situation presented on the picrure below.

 

850e24cef49a832f99913a8177a26e8e.png

 

The MOST annoying part of working with TestStand is the fact that the developer has to re-enter e-v-e-r-y bloody value for a given parameter when the prototype changes in a LabVIEW VI. 

 

As a sister idea to this one, what is more annoying is the fact that when the container exists for a previous step and is already populated with all the values that you want to repeat elsewhere, TestStand does not allow you to copy and replace a parameter!  Unless there a non-obvious way of doing this (I will attempt a few unorthodox ways to get this done).  If so, it should be an obvious method and not something that requires contortions to accomplish a simple copy & paste. 

 

 

 

Even if the copy & paste could be done from within the parameters, ie: ability to select multiple values and paste them all into the parameter.  This is such a basic feature is most or all programming languages and applications that I cannot believe it does not exist in TestStand. 

 

In this particular case, the values are from Locals. variables.  And there are lots of them; between two parameters, over 300!!

 

Let's get on with the times!!  Improve the copy & paste feature, even for an ultra basic request like the one Ray Farmer requested in 2011..  See this link:

http://forums.ni.com/t5/NI-TestStand-Idea-Exchange/New-Paste-Value/idc-p/2504798#M721